Evaluating the content validity of generic preference-based measures for use in Parkinson's disease

被引:10
|
作者
Kuspinar, Ayse [1 ]
Mate, Kedar [2 ]
Lafontaine, Anne-Louise [3 ,4 ]
Mayo, Nancy [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, 1400 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Parkinson disease; Quality of life; Patient reported outcome measures; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NONMOTOR SYMPTOMS; HEALTH; MULTIATTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Generic preference-based measures are used to assess the cost-utility of different interventions in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the difficulty of using them in people with a particular health condition is that these measures may not encapsulate all of the domains that are impacted by the disease. Objective: To contribute evidence towards the content validity of generic preference-based measures in people with PD. Methods: Participants with PD were interviewed on a personalized measure of quality of life, the Patient Generated Index (PGI). The domains identified with the PGI were then categorized using the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The extent to which the generic measures (EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II, and HUI III) included domains important to persons with PD was qualitatively evaluated. Results: The study included seventy-six participants with PD (mean age 69 years). Dexterity, the top domain nominated by participants, was only included in 1 out of 4 of the generic measures. Fatigue, another commonly reported problem, was not included in 3 out of 4 measures. Sleep, dyskinesia and bowel/bladder problems were not included in any of the measures. Conclusion: Content validity is an essential step in the evaluation of whether a questionnaire truly measures the construct it purports to measure, in this case the construct being health related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II and HUI III in people with PD, and demonstrated that several important PD specific domains are missing from these measures.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 116
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Content Validity of Preference-Based Measures in Cancer
    Gibson, Adam E. J.
    Longworth, Louise
    Bennett, Bryan
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Shaw, James W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (01) : 70 - 78
  • [2] Content validity of preference-based measures for economic evaluation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Mehdipour, Ava
    O'Hoski, Sachi
    Beauchamp, Marla K.
    Wald, Joshua
    Kuspinar, Ayse
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [3] Assessment of the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based quality of life measures in people with Parkinson's: a systematic review
    Xin, Yiqiao
    McIntosh, Emma
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [4] Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and Generic Preference-Based Measures
    Khan, Kamran A.
    Madan, Jason
    Petrou, Stavros
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (06) : 686 - 695
  • [5] A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models
    Brazier, John
    Ara, Roberta
    Rowen, Donna
    Chevrou-Severac, Helene
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2017, 35 : S21 - S31
  • [6] The psychometric performance of generic preference-based measures for patients with pressure ulcers
    Palfreyman, Simon
    Mulhern, Brendan
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [7] A qualitative exploration of the content and face validity of preference-based measures within the context of dementia
    Lidia Engel
    Jessica Bucholc
    Cathrine Mihalopoulos
    Brendan Mulhern
    Julie Ratcliffe
    Mark Yates
    Lisa Hanna
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18
  • [8] Assessment of the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based quality of life measures in people with Parkinson’s: a systematic review
    Yiqiao Xin
    Emma McIntosh
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 1 - 23
  • [9] A qualitative exploration of the content and face validity of preference-based measures within the context of dementia
    Engel, Lidia
    Bucholc, Jessica
    Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Yates, Mark
    Hanna, Lisa
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [10] What is the evidence for the performance of generic preference-based measures? A systematic overview of reviews
    Finch, Aureliano Paolo
    Brazier, John Edward
    Mukuria, Clara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 19 (04) : 557 - 570