Observation of Bifid Mandibular Canal Using Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography

被引:14
作者
Naitoh, Munetaka [1 ]
Hiraiwa, Yuichiro [1 ]
Aimiya, Hidetoshi [1 ]
Ariji, Eiichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Aichi Gakuin Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Sch Dent, Chigusa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4648651, Japan
关键词
bifurcation; cone-beam computerized tomography; dental implant; mandibular canal; retromolar; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS; BONE; AUGMENTATION; NERVE; CT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Some variations of the mandibular canal (so-called bifid mandibular canal) have been reported using various radiography techniques; however, the occurrences of bifid mandibular canal were less than 1% according to panoramic radiographic surveys. The purpose of the present investigation was to clarify the rate and type of bifid mandibular canal in the mandibular ramus region, as observed using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-two patients who had undergone preoperative imaging of dental implant treatment using CBCT were enrolled in the investigation. Two-dimensional (2D) images of various planes in the mandibular ramus region were reconstructed on a computer using three-dimensional visualization and measurement software. The course of the mandibular canal was observed and the length of the bifid canal was measured. Results: Bifid mandibular canal in the mandibular ramus region was observed in 65% of patients and 43% of sides. Bifid mandibular canal can be classified into four types: retromolar, dental, forward, and buccolingual canals. Conclusion: Bifid mandibular canal was observed at a high rate using CBCT INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2009;24:155-159
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 159
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging [J].
Baba, R ;
Ueda, K ;
Okabe, M .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (05) :285-290
[2]  
CARTER RB, 1971, J ANAT, V108, P433
[3]   Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report [J].
Claeys, V ;
Wackens, G .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) :55-58
[4]   BIFID MANDIBULAR NERVE AS A POSSIBLE CAUSE OF INADEQUATE ANESTHESIA IN THE MANDIBLE [J].
GROVER, PS ;
LORTON, L .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1983, 41 (03) :177-179
[5]   E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of Diagnostic Imaging in Implant Dentistry - A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. [J].
Harris, D ;
Buser, D ;
Dula, K ;
Gröndahl, K ;
Harris, D ;
Jacobs, R ;
Lekholm, U ;
Nakielny, R ;
van Steenberghe, D ;
van der Stelt, P .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (05) :566-570
[6]  
IWAI K, 2007, 48 ANN C JAP SOC OR, V66
[7]  
Khoury F, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P557
[8]  
Kodera H, 1995, KAIBOUGAKU ZASHI, V70, P23
[9]   BIFID MANDIBULAR CANALS IN PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS [J].
LANGLAIS, RP ;
BROADUS, R ;
GLASS, BJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 110 (06) :923-926
[10]  
Lea F, 1985, CLEMENTE CDCRANIAL N, V4, P1165