Should the ecosystem services concept be used in European Commission impact assessment?

被引:16
作者
Diehl, Katharina [1 ]
Burkhard, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Jacob, Klaus [3 ]
机构
[1] Impact Assessment Res Grp, Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Ecosyst Management, Inst Nat Resource Conservat, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Environm Policy Res Ctr, Dept Polit & Social Sci, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Sustainability; Integration; European Union; Requisite variety; Policy assessment; Ecosystem services; DECISION-MAKING; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC VALUATION; PUBLIC-POLICY; FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE; SUPPORT; SCIENCE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Integrated impact assessment (IA) of policies in the European Commission takes place in an environment of competing problem frames, contested policy objectives and a multitude of interested actors. This paper sets out to discuss the potential value of integrating the ecosystem services (ESS) concept for improving the consideration of environmental benefits and values during framing and appraisal of new policies at European level. The discussion was based on a workshop conducted with experts encompassing their disciplinary fields to the science-policy interface. A review of recent literature and impact assessment reports from policy science and ecosystem services research allowed for a two-way contemplation. The potential integration of concepts was analysed for conceptual, technical, ethical and pragmatic aspects. It was found that indicator sets applied in the impact assessment reports follow a much less formalised structure than the reports or the procedure. An integration of the ecosystem services concept would enhance the requisite variety of indicators used, and thus contribute to the overall goal for sustainable development. Potentials for improving IA lie particularly in the up- and downscaling of benefits and values, policy relevant comparative studies and the prospective possibilities for innovation in indicator development. Based on this rationale of improving requisite variety for future decision making, the emphasis lies on a further development of the ESS concept along two pathways of operationalisation: the translation of the concept for a comprehensive approach at a higher level of abstraction (soft application), and the application of the concept for providing aggregated, quantitative and unit-based information at different steps of an IA (hard application). (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 17
页数:12
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability [J].
Abson, D. J. ;
von Wehrden, H. ;
Baumgaertner, S. ;
Fischer, J. ;
Hanspach, J. ;
Haerdtle, W. ;
Heinrichs, H. ;
Klein, A. M. ;
Lang, D. J. ;
Martens, P. ;
Walmsley, D. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 103 :29-37
[2]   Quantifying ecosystem services and indicators for science, policy and practice [J].
Alkemade, Rob ;
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Nedkov, Stoyan ;
Petz, Katalin .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 :161-162
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, MAND REP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, TEEB THE EC ECOSYSTE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HUNG GEOGR B, DOI DOI 10.1787/1999155X
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Impact Assessment Guidelines (SEC(2009) 92)
[9]   Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy [J].
Anton, Christian ;
Young, Juliette ;
Harrison, Paula A. ;
Musche, Martin ;
Bela, Gyoergyi ;
Feld, Christian K. ;
Harrington, Richard ;
Haslett, John R. ;
Pataki, Gyoergy ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. ;
Skourtos, Michalis ;
Sousa, J. Paulo ;
Sykes, Martin T. ;
Tinch, Rob ;
Vandewalle, Marie ;
Watt, Allan ;
Settele, Josef .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) :2979-2994
[10]   Ecosystem services and environmental decision making: Seeking order in complexity [J].
Apitz, Sabine E. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 (02) :214-230