Assessment of environmental risks of underground transport infrastructure development by BOCR method

被引:0
作者
Pankratova, Nataliya [1 ]
Nedashkovskaya, Nadezhda
Haiko, Hennadii [2 ]
Biletskyi, Volodymyr [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Ukraine, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytech Inst, Inst Appl Syst Anal IASA, IASA Res, 37 Peremogy Ave, UA-03056 Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Inst Energy Saving & Energy Management, Dept Geoengn, Kiev, Ukraine
[3] Natl Tech Univ, Kharkiv Polytechn Inst, Dept Oil Gas & Gascondensate Prod, 21 Kirpichova St, UA-61002 Kharkov, Ukraine
来源
VISNYK OF V N KARAZIN KHARKIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY-SERIES GEOLOGY GEOGRAPHY ECOLOGY | 2021年 / 55期
关键词
urban space; underground infrastructure; environmental risks; technogenic risks; system analysis;
D O I
10.26565/2410-7360-2021-55-21
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Formulation of the problem. Solving the problems of urban transport communications, in particular the constantly growing intensity of automobile traffic in megalopolises, is one of the main directions of minimizing the environmental and man-made risks of the urban environment. Global concepts of greening large cities pay considerable attention to the possibilities of underground space to take on the functions of the most dangerous and risky surface objects and communications, since the impact of any underground object on the environment is much lower (than similar on the surface) and can be better controlled. At the same time, planning for the development of underground transport infrastructure should be based on a systematic methodology and tools for analyzing complex systems. Purpose. It consists in the use of system tools (BOCR method - criteria of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks) for planning underground transport infrastructure of large cities to ensure minimization of environmental and man-made risks of urban space and prioritization for the construction of road tunnels (for example, the General Plan of the Kiev city). Methodology. A methodology and decision support toolkit for calculating the priorities of alternatives based on hierarchical and network criteria models are proposed. The modified BOCR method developed by the authors (N. Pankratova, N.I. Nedashkovskaya) was applied to assess decision alternatives taking into account benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. Results. System models of two road tunnels, according to the General plan of the Kiev city until 2025 were developed. Assessment of the models using the BOCR method (criteria for benefits, opportunities, costs and risks) was performed. The priorities of alternatives for tunnels' routes aggregated over a network of parameters and a reasonably expedient sequence of their construction were calculated according to the criteria for reducing the environmental and man-made risks of the urbanized space. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the target function of the system model for the development of underground infrastructure in large cities is to minimize the environmental and man-made risks of urban space. The capabilities of the modified BOCR method have been expanded and two alternative tunnel track models have been successfully tested. Practical significance. The research methods and results provide investors, city state administrations and public organizations with an effective toolkit for assessing the priority of the construction of underground urban facilities to regulate urban development in order to improve environmental standards and the safety of life in megacities.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 298
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process
    Ameen, Raed Fawzi Mohammed
    Mourshed, Monjur
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 : 356 - 366
  • [2] [Anonymous], REG REP STAT ENV KYI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Technical report
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, UNDERGROUND ENG SUST
  • [5] Bezlyubchenko O. S., 2008, URBAN PLANNING TRANS, P156
  • [6] Mapping urban underground potential in Dakar, Senegal: From the analytic hierarchy process to self-organizing maps
    Doyle, Michael R.
    [J]. UNDERGROUND SPACE, 2020, 5 (03) : 267 - 280
  • [7] Golubev G. E., 2005, UNDERGROUND URBANISM
  • [8] FORECAST ASSESSMENT METHODS OF GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT PROMOTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF URBANISTICS SUBJECTS
    Haiko, Hennadii
    Matviichuk, Ivan
    Biletskyi, Volodymyr
    Saluga, Piotr
    [J]. VISNYK OF V N KARAZIN KHARKIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY-SERIES GEOLOGY GEOGRAPHY ECOLOGY, 2018, (48): : 39 - 51
  • [9] Hayko H. I., 2016, B NTUU KYIV POLYTECH, P196
  • [10] Kartoziya B. A., 2015, MINING INFORM ANALYT, P615