Dispersal traits linked to range size through range location, not dispersal ability, in Western Australian angiosperms

被引:17
作者
Gove, Aaron D. [1 ,2 ]
Fitzpatrick, Matthew C. [3 ,4 ]
Majer, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Dunn, Robert R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Dept Environm & Aquat Sci, Ctr Ecosyst Divers & Dynam, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Petersham, MA 01366 USA
[4] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Biol Sci, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2009年 / 18卷 / 05期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Angiosperm diversity; biogeography; dispersal; latitude; myrmecochory; Western Australia; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; ANT-PLANT MUTUALISM; GEOGRAPHIC RANGE; SEED DISPERSAL; GROWTH FORM; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; ECOLOGICAL TRAITS; FLESHY FRUITS; PLASTID RBCL; LIFE-HISTORY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00470.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim We examine the relative importance of seed dispersal mode in determining the range size and range placement in 524 species from six focal plant families (Agavaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Malvacaeae, Sapindaceae, Proteaceae and Fabaceae (Acacia)). Location Western Australia. Methods Taxa were categorized by dispersal mode and life-form and their distributions modelled using maxent. Geographical range size was compared amongst dispersal mode, life-form and biome using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Geographical range placement was considered in a similar manner. Results Range size did not vary with dispersal mode (ant versus wind and vertebrate dispersal) or life-form, and instead varied primarily as a function of the biogeographical region in which a species was found. Range placement, however, did vary among dispersal modes, with the consequence that diversity of wind- and ant-dispersed plants increased with latitude while the diversity of vertebrate-dispersed plants was more evenly distributed. Main conclusions For the taxa studied, range sizes were a function of the biogeographical region in which species were found. Although differences in range size may exist among species differing in dispersal modes, they are likely to be far smaller than differences among species from different biogeographical regions. The trait most likely to affect species geographical range size, and hence rarity and risks associated with other threats, may simply be the geographical region in which that species has evolved.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CLIM DAT ONL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 2008 REV IUCN RED LI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BOT J LINN SOC, V141, P399, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.1095-8339.2003.T01-1-00158.X
[4]   Geographic range, turnover rate and the scaling of species diversity [J].
Arita, HT ;
Rodríguez, P .
ECOGRAPHY, 2002, 25 (05) :541-550
[5]  
Beard J. S., 1980, WA HERBARIUM RES NOT, V3, P37
[6]  
Beard J.S., 1990, PLANT LIFE W AUSTR
[7]  
Beattie A J., 1985, The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms
[8]  
BEATTIE AJ, 1983, SONDERBD NATURWISS V, V7, P249
[9]   MYRMECOCHOROUS PLANTS IN AUSTRALIA AND THEIR DISPERSAL BY ANTS [J].
BERG, RY .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1975, 23 (03) :475-508
[10]   Fleshy fruits - origins, niche shifts, and diversification [J].
Bolmgren, K ;
Eriksson, O .
OIKOS, 2005, 109 (02) :255-272