An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance

被引:223
作者
Kim, Soo Wook [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Business Adm, Seoul 151916, South Korea
关键词
Supply chain integration; Supply chain management practice; Competition capability; Firm performance; Direct effect; Indirect effect; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; MANUFACTURING STRATEGY; COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; EXTERNAL INTEGRATION; CAPABILITIES; DIVERSIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY; ADVANTAGE; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research is to examine the causal linkages among supply chain management (SCM) practice, competition capability. the level of supply chain (SC) integration, and firm performance. This is helpful in developing a framework for linking a firm's SC integration strategy to its competitive strategy, and in identifying how such linkage can be connected to the improvement of organizational performance. Such effort should enable us to derive a set of advisable utilization strategies of supply chain practices for SC integration. From the results of LISREL analysis on Korean and Japanese manufacturing firms and subsequent equality test for multi-group, this paper finds that, in case of Korean firms, efficient supply chain integration may play more critical role for sustainable SCM competitiveness, while, in Japanese firms, the close interrelationship between the level of SCM practices and competition capability may have more significant effect on SCM competitiveness. This finding derives a strategic framework that, in early stage, the emphasis on systemic supply chain integration may be more crucial, and, in the stage after setting supply chain integration on its way somewhat, the movement of strategy focus into the pursuit of high level of consistency between SCM strategy and competitive strategy may be advisable. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 346
页数:19
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Ahmad S, 2001, PROD OPER MANAG, V10, P16, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00065.x
  • [2] STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH
    ANDERSON, JC
    GERBING, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 411 - 423
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Management International Review
  • [4] [Anonymous], INT J MANAGEMENT
  • [5] Armistead C.G., 1993, Logistics Information Management, V6, P9, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059310045907, DOI 10.1108/09576059310045907]
  • [6] ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS
    ARMSTRONG, JS
    OVERTON, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) : 396 - 402
  • [7] Bagozzi R.P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1177/009207038801600107]
  • [8] REPRESENTING AND TESTING ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - A HOLISTIC CONSTRUAL
    BAGOZZI, RP
    PHILLIPS, LW
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (03) : 459 - 489
  • [9] The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991
    Barney, J
    Wright, M
    Ketchen, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) : 625 - 641
  • [10] Bentler P. M., 1995, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT