A visitor's guide to effect sizes - Statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings

被引:329
作者
Hojat, M
Xu, G
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Ctr Res Med Educ & Hlth Care, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
clinical significance; effect size; medical education research; practical importance;
D O I
10.1023/B:AHSE.0000038173.00909.f6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Effect Sizes (ES) are an increasingly important index used to quantify the degree of practical significance of study results. This paper gives an introduction to the computation and interpretation of effect sizes from the perspective of the consumer of the research literature. The key points made are: 1. ES is a useful indicator of the practical (clinical) importance of research results that can be operationally defined from being "negligible" to "moderate", to "important". 2. The ES has two advantages over statistical significance testing: (a) it is independent of the size of the sample; (b) it is a scale-free index. Therefore, ES can be uniformly interpreted in different studies regardless of the sample size and the original scales of the variables. 3. Calculations of the ES are illustrated by using examples of comparisons between two means, correlation coefficients, chi-square tests and two proportions, along with appropriate formulas. 4. Operational definitions for the ESs are given, along with numerical examples for the purpose of illustration.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[2]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[3]   Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs [J].
Dunlap, WP ;
Cortina, JM ;
Vaslow, JB ;
Burke, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :170-177
[4]   MAGNITUDE OF EXPERIMENTAL EFFECT AND A TABLE FOR ITS RAPID ESTIMATION [J].
FRIEDMAN, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1968, 70 (04) :245-&
[5]   ESTIMATION OF EFFECT SIZE FROM A SERIES OF EXPERIMENTS INVOLVING PAIRED COMPARISONS [J].
GIBBONS, RD ;
HEDEKER, DR ;
DAVIS, JM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STATISTICS, 1993, 18 (03) :271-279
[6]  
Glass G.V., 1981, Meta-analysis in social research
[7]  
Hedges L. V., 1981, J ED STAT, V6, P107, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1164588, 10.3102/10769986006002107, 10.2307/1164588]
[8]  
Hedges L. V., 1985, Statistical methods for meta-analysis
[9]   ESTIMATION OF EFFECT SIZE FROM A SERIES OF INDEPENDENT EXPERIMENTS [J].
HEDGES, LV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (02) :490-499
[10]   CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE - A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO DEFINING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN PSYCHOTHERAPY-RESEARCH [J].
JACOBSON, NS ;
TRUAX, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (01) :12-19