How Contact Experiences Shape Welcoming: Perspectives from US-Born and Immigrant Groups

被引:31
作者
Tropp, Linda R. [1 ,2 ]
Okamoto, Dina G. [3 ,4 ]
Marrow, Helen B. [5 ]
Jones-Correa, Michael [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Social Psychol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Publ Policy, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sociol, Bloomington, IN USA
[4] Indiana Univ, CRRES, Bloomington, IN USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sociol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Polit Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Ctr Study Ethn Race & Immigrat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
discrimination; immigration; integration; intergroup contact; welcoming; INTERGROUP CONTACT; NEGATIVE CONTACT; INTERRACIAL CONTACT; RACIAL-ATTITUDES; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; PREJUDICE; MINORITY; MAJORITY; THREAT; WHITES;
D O I
10.1177/0190272517747265
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research examines how intergroup contact experiencesincluding both their frequency and their qualities (friendly, discriminatory)predict indicators of welcoming among U.S.-born and immigrant groups. Analyzing a new survey of U.S.-born groups (whites and blacks) and immigrant groups (Mexicans and Indians) from the Atlanta and Philadelphia metropolitan areas (total N = 2,006), we examine welcoming as a key dimension of social integration. Along with reporting their contact experiences, survey respondents indicated the extent to which they are inclined to welcome and feel welcomed by each of the other groups. Results consistently demonstrated that greater contact frequency predicted greater tendencies to welcome and feel welcomed by each of the other groups. These effects persisted even when demographic characteristics, perceived discrimination, and exposure are included as predictors in the models. Findings also suggested that racial and nativity hierarchies shape how perceived discrimination predicts welcoming others and feeling welcomed by others.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 47
页数:25
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Alba R, 2015, STRANGERS NO MORE: IMMIGRATION AND THE CHALLENGES OF INTEGRATION IN NORTH AMERICA AND WESTERN EUROPE, P1
[2]  
Alba Richard., 2003, REMAKING AM MAINSTRE
[3]  
Allport G., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, V3rd
[5]   The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice [J].
Barlow, Fiona Kate ;
Paolini, Stefania ;
Pedersen, Anne ;
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Radke, Helena R. M. ;
Harwood, Jake ;
Rubin, Mark ;
Sibley, Chris G. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (12) :1629-1643
[6]  
Bean FrankD., 2015, Parents without Papers: The Progress and Pitfalls of Mexican American Integration
[7]  
Bergmann J., 2016, BUILDING CONTACT IMM
[8]   Does Contact Reduce Prejudice or Does Prejudice Reduce Contact? A Longitudinal Test of the Contact Hypothesis Among Majority and Minority Groups in Three European Countries [J].
Binder, Jens ;
Zagefka, Hanna ;
Brown, Rupert ;
Funke, Friedrich ;
Kessler, Thomas ;
Mummendey, Amelie ;
Maquil, Annemie ;
Demoulin, Stephanie ;
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (04) :843-856
[9]  
Bloemraad Irene., 2006, BECOMING CITIZEN INC
[10]  
BLUMER H, 1958, PAC SOCIOL REV, V1, P3