Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo™ algorithm in cardiac surgery patients

被引:51
作者
Senn, Alban [1 ]
Button, Danny [1 ]
Zollinger, Andreas [1 ]
Hofer, Christoph K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Triemli City Hosp Zurich, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2009年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
ARTERIAL-PRESSURE WAVE; PULSE-CONTOUR ANALYSIS; FORM ANALYSIS; THERMODILUTION TECHNIQUE; CATHETER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/cc7739
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction The FloTrac/Vigileo(TM) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) allows pulse pressure-derived cardiac output measurement without external calibration. Software modifications were performed in order to eliminate initially observed deficits. The aim of this study was to assess changes in cardiac output determined by the FloTrac/Vigileo(TM) system (FCO) with an initially released (FCOA) and a modified (FCOB) software version, as well as changes in cardiac output from the PiCCOplus(TM) system (PCO; Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). Both devices were compared with cardiac output measured by intermittent thermodilution (ICO). Methods Cardiac output measurements were performed in patients after elective cardiac surgery. Two sets of data (A and B) were obtained using FCOA and FCOB in 50 patients. After calibration of the PiCCOplus(TM) system, triplicate FCO and PCO values were recorded and ICO was determined in the supine position and cardiac output changes due to body positioning were recorded 15 minutes later (30 degrees head-up, 30 degrees head-down, supine). Student's t test, analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis were calculated. Results Significant changes of FCO, PCO and ICO induced by body positioning were observed in both data sets. For set A, Delta FCOA was significantly larger than Delta ICO induced by positioning the head down. For set B, there were no significant differences between Delta FCOB and Delta ICO. For set A, increased limits of agreement were found for FCOA-ICO when compared with PCO-ICO. For set B, mean bias and limits of agreement were comparable for FCOB-ICO and PCO-ICO. Conclusions The modification of the FloTrac/Vigileo(TM) system resulted in an improved performance in order to reliably assess cardiac output and track the related changes in patients after cardiac surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery
    Breukers, Rose-Marieke B. G. E.
    Sepehrkhouy, Shahrzad
    Spiegelenberg, Stefan R.
    Groeneveld, A. B. Johan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2007, 21 (05) : 632 - 635
  • [2] Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Nigileo™ system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
    Button, D.
    Weibel, L.
    Reuthebuch, O.
    Genoni, M.
    Zollinger, A.
    Hofer, C. K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 99 (03) : 329 - 336
  • [3] Comparison of FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements
    Cannesson, M.
    Attof, Y.
    Rosamel, P.
    Joseph, P.
    Bastien, O.
    Lehot, J.-J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (10) : 832 - 839
  • [4] The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients
    Connors, AF
    Speroff, T
    Dawson, NV
    Thomas, C
    Harrell, FE
    Wagner, D
    Desbiens, N
    Goldman, L
    Wu, AW
    Califf, RM
    Fulkerson, WJ
    Vidaillet, H
    Broste, S
    Bellamy, P
    Lynn, J
    Knaus, WA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (11): : 889 - 897
  • [5] A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques
    Critchley, LAH
    Critchley, JAJH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1999, 15 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [6] Della Rocca G, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P707
  • [7] Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement:: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique
    Della Rocca, G
    Costa, MG
    Pompei, L
    Coccia, C
    Pietropaoli, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (03) : 350 - 356
  • [8] Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: a comparison of pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis
    Felbinger, TW
    Reuter, DA
    Eltzschig, HK
    Bayerlein, J
    Goetz, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2005, 17 (04) : 241 - 248
  • [9] Gödje O, 2002, CRIT CARE MED, V30, P52
  • [10] Agreement between PiCCO pulse-contour analysis, pulmonal artery thermodilution and transthoracic thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery
    Halvorsen, P. S.
    Espinoza, A.
    Lundblad, R.
    Cvancarova, M.
    Hol, P. K.
    Fosse, E.
    Tonnessen, T. I.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (09) : 1050 - 1057