The cost-effectiveness of weight management programmes in a postnatal population

被引:4
|
作者
Rawdin, A. C. [1 ]
Duenas, A. [1 ,2 ]
Chilcott, J. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] CNRS, HEMO, LEM, IESEG Sch Management, Paris, France
关键词
Weight management following pregnancy; Health economics; Mathematical modelling; Childbirth; Public health; Cost effectiveness; LONG-TERM OBESITY; AEROBIC EXERCISE; LACTATING WOMEN; PREGNANCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2014.07.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a weight management programme including elements of physical exercise and dietary restriction which are designed to help women lose excess weight gained during pregnancy in the vulnerable postnatal period and inhibit the development of behaviours which could lead to future excess weight gain and obesity. Study design: A mathematical model based on a regression equation predicting change in weight over a fifteen year postnatal period was developed. Methods: The model included programme effectiveness and resource data based on a randomized controlled trial of a weight management programme implemented in a postnatal population in the United States. Utility and mortality data based on body mass index categories were also included. The model adopted a National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS) perspective, a lifetime time horizon and estimated the cost effectiveness of a weight management programme against a no change comparator in terms of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: The baseline results show that the difference in weight between women who received the weight management programme and women who received the control intervention was 3.02 kg at six months and 3.53 kg at fifteen years following childbirth. This results in an ICER of 7355 pound per quality adjusted life year (QALY) for women who were married at childbirth. Conclusion: The estimated ICER would suggest that such a weight management programme is cost-effective at a NICE threshold of 20,000 pound per QALY. However significant structural and evidence based uncertainty is present in the analysis. (C) 2014 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 810
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The need for cost-effectiveness analyses of antimicrobial stewardship programmes: A structured review
    Coulter, Sonali
    Merollini, Katharina
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Graves, Nicholas
    Halton, Kate
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2015, 46 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [2] The cost-effectiveness of the LighterLife weight management programme as an intervention for obesity in England
    Lewis, L.
    Taylor, M.
    Broom, J.
    Johnston, K. L.
    CLINICAL OBESITY, 2014, 4 (03) : 180 - 188
  • [3] State pharmaceutical importation programmes: an analysis of the cost-effectiveness
    Lybecker, Kristina M. L. Acri Nee
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [4] Review of published cost-effectiveness studies on tuberculosis treatment programmes
    Fryatt, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 1997, 1 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [5] Cost and cost-effectiveness of soil-transmitted helminth treatment programmes: systematic review and research needs
    Hugo C. Turner
    James E. Truscott
    T. Déirdre Hollingsworth
    Alison A. Bettis
    Simon J. Brooker
    Roy M. Anderson
    Parasites & Vectors, 8
  • [6] The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a community weight management intervention: A randomized controlled trial of the health weight management demonstration
    Hersey, James C.
    Khavjou, Olga
    Strange, Laura B.
    Atkinson, Richard L.
    Blair, Steven N.
    Campbell, Susan
    Hobbs, Connie L.
    Kelly, Bridget
    Fitzgerald, Tania M.
    Kish-Doto, Julia
    Koch, Matthew A.
    Munoz, Breda
    Peele, Eric
    Stockdale, Jason
    Augustine, Cynthia
    Mitchell, Glenda
    Arday, David
    Kugler, John
    Dorn, Patricia
    Ellzy, James
    Julian, Regina
    Grissom, Joyce
    Britt, Marcia
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 54 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness strategies in OSAS management: a short review
    Toraldo, D. M.
    Passali, D.
    Sanna, A.
    De Nuccio, F.
    Conte, L.
    De Benedetto, M.
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2017, 37 (06) : 447 - 453
  • [8] Cost and cost-effectiveness of soil-transmitted helminth treatment programmes: systematic review and research needs
    Turner, Hugo C.
    Truscott, James E.
    Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre
    Bettis, Alison A.
    Brooker, Simon J.
    Anderson, Roy M.
    PARASITES & VECTORS, 2015, 8
  • [9] The cost-effectiveness of varicella and combined varicella and herpes zoster vaccination programmes in the United Kingdom
    van Hoek, Albert Jan
    Melegaro, Alessia
    Gay, Nigel
    Bilcke, Joke
    Edmunds, W. John
    VACCINE, 2012, 30 (06) : 1225 - 1234
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness of Urolithiasis Management in Pregnancy
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2019, 6 (06) : 344 - 344