Modeling Collaborative Interaction Patterns in a Simulation-Based Task

被引:19
作者
Andrews, Jessica J. [1 ]
Kerr, Deirdre [2 ]
Mislevy, Robert J. [3 ]
von Davier, Alina [1 ]
Hao, Jiangang [4 ]
Liu, Lei [5 ]
机构
[1] Educ Testing Serv, 660 Rosedale Rd,MS 12-T, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[2] Educ Testing Serv, 90 New Montgomery St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
[3] Educ Testing Serv, Measurement & Stat, 660 Rosedale Rd,MS 12-T, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[4] Educ Testing Serv, 660 Rosedale Rd, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
[5] Educ Testing Serv, 18E,660 Rosedale Rd, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jedm.12132
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Simulations and games offer interactive tasks that can elicit rich data, providing evidence of complex skills that are difficult to measure with more conventional items and tests. However, one notable challenge in using such technologies is making sense of the data generated in order to make claims about individuals or groups. This article presents a novel methodological approach that uses the process data and performance outcomes from a simulation-based collaborative science assessment to explore the propensities of dyads to interact in accordance with certain interaction patterns. Further exploratory analyses examine how the approach can be used to answer important questions in collaboration research regarding gender and cultural differences in collaborative behavior and how interaction patterns relate to performance outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 69
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity [J].
Liu, Chen-Chung ;
Tsai, Chin-Chung .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 50 (03) :627-639
[22]  
Liu L., 2015, Handbook of research on technology tools for real-world skill development, P344, DOI DOI 10.4018/978
[23]   Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? [J].
Mohammed, S ;
Angell, LC .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (06) :651-677
[24]  
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2013, PISA 2015 COLL PROBL
[25]  
Plummer M, 2003, P 3 INT WORKSH DISTR
[26]  
Powers D., 2008, STAT METHODS CATEGOR
[27]   Gender-related differences in computer-mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning [J].
Prinsen, F. R. ;
Volman, M. L. L. ;
Terwel, J. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2007, 23 (05) :393-409
[28]  
Rasch G., 1977, DANISH YB PHILOS, V14, P58, DOI DOI 10.1163/24689300-01401006
[29]  
Rasch G, 1960, PROBABILISTIC MODELS
[30]   Comparability of conflict opportunities in human-to-human and human-to-agent online collaborative problem solving [J].
Rosen Y. .
Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2014, 19 (1-2) :147-164