An approach to group decision making with heterogeneous incomplete uncertain preference relations

被引:38
作者
Zhang, Zhen [1 ]
Guo, Chonghui [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Inst Syst Engn, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision making; Incomplete uncertain preference relation; Priority weight; Optimization; GOAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; INFORMATION; MODEL; CONSENSUS; CONSISTENCY; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2014.02.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
For practical group decision making problems, decision makers tend to provide heterogeneous uncertain preference relations due to the uncertainty of the decision environment and the difference of cultures and education backgrounds. Sometimes, decision makers may not have an in-depth knowledge of the problem to be solved and provide incomplete preference relations. In this paper, we focus on group decision making (GDM) problems with heterogeneous incomplete uncertain preference relations, including uncertain multiplicative preference relations, uncertain fuzzy preference relations, uncertain linguistic preference relations and intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. To deal with such GDM problems, a decision analysis method is proposed. Based on the multiplicative consistency of uncertain preference relations, a bi-objective optimization model which aims to maximize both the group consensus and the individual consistency of each decision maker is established. By solving the optimization model, the priority weights of alternatives can be obtained. Finally, some illustrative examples are used to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences
    Alonso, S.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    Chiclana, F.
    Herrera, F.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2010, 180 (23) : 4477 - 4495
  • [2] INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL STRATEGIES TO DEAL WITH IGNORANCE SITUATIONS IN MULTI-PERSON DECISION MAKING
    Alonso, S.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    Chiclana, F.
    Herrera, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2009, 8 (02) : 313 - 333
  • [3] A Relative Entropy Approach to Group Decision Making with Interval Reciprocal Relations Based on COWA Operator
    Chen, Huayou
    Zhou, Ligang
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2012, 21 (04) : 585 - 599
  • [4] Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making
    Delgado, M
    Herrera, F
    Herrera-Viedma, E
    Martinez, L
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1998, 107 (1-4) : 177 - 194
  • [5] Linguistic multiperson decision making based on the use of multiple preference relations
    Dong, Yucheng
    Xu, Yinfeng
    Yu, Shui
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 160 (05) : 603 - 623
  • [6] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HETEROGENEOUS DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACHES APPLIED TO SUSTAINABLE ENERGY EVALUATION
    Espinilla, Macarena
    Palomares, Ivan
    Martinez, Luis
    Ruan, Da
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2012, 20 : 159 - 174
  • [7] A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    Ma, Jian
    Jiang, Yan-Ping
    Sun, Yong-Hong
    Ma, Louis
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) : 311 - 321
  • [8] A goal programming approach to group decision-making with three formats of incomplete preference relations
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    Zhang, Yao
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 14 (10) : 1083 - 1090
  • [9] An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making
    Fan, ZP
    Xiao, SH
    Hu, GF
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 46 (02) : 329 - 335
  • [10] Consolidating SWOT analysis with nonhomogeneous uncertain preference information
    Gao, Chang-Yuan
    Peng, Ding-Hong
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2011, 24 (06) : 796 - 808