Honeycomb Wachspress finite elements for structural topology optimization

被引:66
作者
Talischi, Cameron [1 ]
Paulino, Glaucio H. [1 ]
Le, Chau H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Newman Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Topology optimization; Checkerboard; Wachspress interpolation functions; Continuous approximation of material distribution; Projection functions; MINIMUM LENGTH SCALE; CHECKERBOARD PATTERNS; DESIGN; INTERPOLATION; POLYGONS; SCHEME; SIMP;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-008-0261-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Traditionally, standard Lagrangian-type finite elements, such as linear quads and triangles, have been the elements of choice in the field of topology optimization. However, finite element meshes with these conventional elements exhibit the well-known "checkerboard" pathology in the iterative solution of topology optimization problems. A feasible alternative to eliminate such long-standing problem consists of using hexagonal (honeycomb) elements with Wachspress-type shape functions. The features of the hexagonal mesh include two-node connections (i.e. two elements are either not connected or connected by two nodes), and three edge-based symmetry lines per element. In contrast, quads can display one-node connections, which can lead to checkerboard; and only have two edge-based symmetry lines. In addition, Wachspress rational shape functions satisfy the partition of unity condition and lead to conforming finite element approximations. We explore the Wachspress-type hexagonal elements and present their implementation using three approaches for topology optimization: element-based, continuous approximation of material distribution, and minimum length-scale through projection functions. Examples are presented that demonstrate the advantages of the proposed element in achieving checkerboard-free solutions and avoiding spurious fine-scale patterns from the design optimization process.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 583
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   AN OPTIMAL-DESIGN PROBLEM WITH PERIMETER PENALIZATION [J].
AMBROSIO, L ;
BUTTAZZO, G .
CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS AND PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, 1993, 1 (01) :55-69
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 7 WORLD C STRUCT M
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, COMPUTER METHODS APP, DOI DOI 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-9
[4]  
Bendse M., 2003, Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications
[5]  
Bendse MP., 1989, Structural optimization, V1, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01650949, 10.1007/BF01650949]
[6]   GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
KIKUCHI, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1988, 71 (02) :197-224
[7]   Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization [J].
Bendsoe, MP ;
Sigmund, O .
ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 1999, 69 (9-10) :635-654
[8]   Large-scale topology optimization in 3D using parallel computing [J].
Borrvall, T ;
Petersson, J .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (46-47) :6201-6229
[9]   Topology optimization using regularized intermediate density control [J].
Borrvall, T ;
Petersson, J .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (37-38) :4911-4928
[10]   A reevaluation of the SIMP method with filtering and an alternative formulation for solid-void topology optimization [J].
Bruns, TE .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 30 (06) :428-436