Retail format selection in on-the-go shopping situations

被引:24
作者
Benoit, Sabine [1 ,2 ]
Evanschitzky, Heiner [3 ]
Teller, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Surrey Business Sch, Dept Mkt & Retail Mgt, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, GPO Box 4, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] Aston Business Sch, ACRI, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
Retail format; Shopping situation; Experiments; Food; Choice; On-the-go consumption; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; PERCEIVED RISK; DECISION-MAKING; MODERATING ROLE; STORE FORMAT; PATRONAGE; CHOICE; MODEL; BRAND; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumers patronize different store formats to purchase products. Prior literature describes store and format choices for big, multi-item shopping baskets, but limited insights determine consumers' unique shopping routines when they seek to buy just one or a few items while on the go. Such shopping situations might affect consumers' format selections for both search and experience goods. This study uses multi-attribute utility theory to develop a framework, tested with a scenario-based experiment. For search goods, a format's economic utility (price level, speed) is more important; its functional utility (quality, variety) and psychological utility (atmosphere, service) become less important considerations. Furthermore, the tolerable range of formats is larger for search goods. The level of on-the-go purchase and consumption frequency moderates these effects. Therefore, this research helps to clarify what drives consumers' format selections in on-the-go shopping situations, with useful managerial insights for how retailers can compete in the growing on-the-go market.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 278
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Consumer attitudes toward low stake risk in food markets [J].
Alfnes, Frode ;
Rickertsen, Kyrre ;
Ueland, Oydis .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2008, 40 (23) :3039-3049
[2]   Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage [J].
Arnold, SJ ;
Handelman, J ;
Tigert, DJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1996, 35 (03) :229-239
[3]   The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions [J].
Baker, J ;
Parasuraman, A ;
Grewal, D ;
Voss, GB .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2002, 66 (02) :120-141
[4]  
Balasubramanian S, 2005, J INTERACT MARK, V19, P12, DOI 10.1002/dir.20032
[5]   EXPLORATORY ASSESSMENT OF SITUATIONAL EFFECTS IN BUYER BEHAVIOR [J].
BELK, RW .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1974, 11 (02) :156-163
[6]   Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping [J].
Bell, DR ;
Ho, TH ;
Tang, CS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (03) :352-369
[7]   Understanding on-the-go consumption: Identifying and quantifying its determinants [J].
Benoit, Sabine ;
Schaefers, Tobias ;
Heider, Raphael .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2016, 31 :32-42
[8]   A model of retail format competition for non-durable goods [J].
Bhatnagar, A ;
Ratchford, BT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2004, 21 (01) :39-59
[9]  
Bloemer J., 1998, EUR J MARKETING, V32 Nos, P499, DOI DOI 10.1108/03090569810216118
[10]   Testing Retail Marketing-Mix Effects on Patronage: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Blut, Markus ;
Teller, Christoph ;
Floh, Arne .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2018, 94 (02) :113-135