What people with normative identities believe about sex, gender and sexual orientation

被引:12
作者
Lloyd, Allison E. [1 ]
Galupo, M. Paz [1 ]
机构
[1] Towson Univ, Psychol Dept, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Essentialism; sex; gender; sexual orientation; social constructionism; ESSENTIALIST BELIEFS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM; HOMOSEXUALITY; ATTITUDES; LESBIANISM; MODELS; BORN;
D O I
10.1080/19419899.2019.1614088
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study examined the beliefs of individuals with normative identities regarding sex, gender and sexual orientation. Data were collected from 691 heterosexual cisgender women and men using an online survey. Participants indicated their agreement regarding their beliefs about the nature of sex, gender and sexual orientation along four dimensions: fixed, binary (i.e. essentialist beliefs), fluid and continuous (i.e. social constructionist beliefs). Data analyses for the present study centred on four 2 (Participant Gender Identity: Woman vs. Man) x 3 (Identity Construct: Sex vs. Gender vs. Sexual Orientation) mixed ANOVAs. Findings suggested that sex, gender and sexual orientation are understood to be distinct and that essentialist and constructionist beliefs follow reverse patterns. Heterosexual cisgender adults rated sex as the most fixed and binary, followed by gender, and then sexual orientation. Conversely, participants rated sexual orientation as the most fluid and continuous followed by gender, and sex. Men consistently rated all three constructs as more fixed and binary and less fluid and continuous than did women. Discussion focuses on the utility of investigating normative beliefs about sex, gender and sexual orientation as parallel constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 280
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, MYTHS GENDER BIOL TH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, AM PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1037/a0024659
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, AM J PSYCHIAT, V157, P1719
  • [4] Development and Initial Validation of the Sexual Orientation Beliefs Scale (SOBS)
    Arseneau, Julie R.
    Grzanka, Patrick R.
    Miles, Joseph R.
    Fassinger, Ruth E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 60 (03) : 407 - 420
  • [5] Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science
    Bailey, J. Michael
    Vasey, Paul L.
    Diamond, Lisa M.
    Breedlove, S. Marc
    Vilain, Eric
    Epprecht, Marc
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2016, 17 (02) : 45 - 101
  • [6] Genetic Essentialism: On the Deceptive Determinism of DNA
    Dar-Nimrod, Ilan
    Heine, Steven J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2011, 137 (05) : 800 - 818
  • [7] De Cecco John., 1993, YOU SEDUCE STRAIGHT
  • [8] Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality
    DeLamater, JD
    Hyde, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [9] Diamond L.M., 2008, SEXUAL FLUIDITY UNDE
  • [10] What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire
    Diamond, LM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 110 (01) : 173 - 192