Implications for the Measurement of Psychopathy in the DSM-5 Using the Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder

被引:12
作者
Kavish, Nicholas [1 ]
Sellbom, Martin [2 ]
Anderson, Jaime L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sam Houston State Univ, Dept Psychol & Philosophy, Huntsville, TX USA
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; 5-FACTOR MODEL; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; FEARLESS DOMINANCE; TRAIT MODEL; SECTION II; CAT-PD; INVENTORY; PID-5; DISCRIMINANT;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2018.1475393
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study investigated the ability of the Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder (CAT-PD) model to capture psychopathy in a sample consisting of U.S. (n = 565) and Australian (n = 99) undergraduates and a U.S. community sample (n = 210). More specifically, this study examined (a) the association between CAT-PD facets, particularly those consistent with DSM-5 Section III antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), and measures of psychopathy, (b) the extent to which CAT-PD ASPD traits improve on DSM-5 Section II ASPD in measuring psychopathy, and (c) the utility of measuring functional impairment in additional to dimensional traits in assessing psychopathy. Analyses revealed CAT-PD ASPD traits, including traits' associations with Section III psychopathy specifier, were strongly associated with measures of psychopathy. Furthermore, CAT-PD ASPD was found to be an improvement over DSM-5 Section II ASPD in measuring psychopathy, and the dimensional nature of the CAT-PD was found to render the addition of measures of impairment unnecessary. These findings generally support the utility of the CAT-PD in the measurement of psychopathy, particularly as it relates to the dimensional assessment of psychopathy in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 480
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   A Psychometric Review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current Status and Future Directions [J].
Al-Dajani, Nadia ;
Gralnick, Tara M. ;
Bagby, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 98 (01) :62-81
[2]   Evaluating the DSM-5 Section III Personality Disorder Impairment Criteria [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 9 (01) :51-61
[3]   COMPARING EXTERNAL CORRELATES OF DSM-5 SECTION II AND SECTION III DIMENSIONAL TRAIT OPERATIONALIZATIONS OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Sansone, Randy A. ;
Songer, Douglas A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2016, 30 (02) :193-210
[4]   EXAMINING THE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN DSM-5 SECTION III ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER TRAITS AND PSYCHOPATHY IN COMMUNITY AND UNIVERSITY SAMPLES [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Wygant, Dustin B. ;
Salekin, Randall T. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2014, 28 (05) :675-697
[5]   On the Convergence Between PSY-5 Domains and PID-5 Domains and Facets: Implications for Assessment of DSM-5 Personality Traits [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Bagby, R. Michael ;
Quilty, Lena C. ;
Veltri, Carlo O. C. ;
Markon, Kristian E. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (03) :286-294
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, VFifth, P1000, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ANTISOCIAL PERSONALI, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203763551
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[9]   The Role of Boldness in Psychopathy: A Study of Academic and Clinical Perceptions [J].
Berg, Joanna M. ;
Lilienfeld, Scott O. ;
Sellbom, Martin .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 8 (04) :319-328
[10]   Multimethod Assessment of Psychopathy in Relation to Factors of Internalizing and Externalizing From the Personality Assessment Inventory: The Impact of Method Variance and Suppressor Effects [J].
Blonigen, Daniel M. ;
Patrick, Christopher J. ;
Douglas, Kevin S. ;
Poythress, Norman G. ;
Skeem, Jennifer L. ;
Lilienfeld, Scott O. ;
Edens, John F. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 22 (01) :96-107