Effect of frother addition mode on coal flotation in down flow flotation column

被引:27
|
作者
Zhu, Hongzheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Jinbo [3 ]
Min, Fanfei [3 ]
Lopez Valdivieso, Alejandro [4 ]
Arroyo, Mario Alberto Corona [5 ]
Wang, Hainan
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Ming Response & Disaster Prevent &, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[2] Gen Res Inst Min & Met, State Key Lab Mineral Proc, Beijing 100160, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Inst Met, Surface Chem Lab, Ave Sierra Leona 550, San Luis Potosi 78210, San Luis Potosi, Mexico
[5] Univ Guanajuato, Dept Minas Met & Geol, Div Ingn, Ex Hacienda San Matias S-N, Guanajuato 36020, Mexico
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Clean coal product; Bubble size; Frother vapor; Combustible matter recovery; Ash content; Flotation rate; SURFACE-AREA FLUX; BUBBLE-SIZE; FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES; GAS HOLDUP; WATER; DODECYLAMINE; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123844
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using a downflow flotation column, we comparatively investigated the effects of two frother addition modes on clean coal production and bubble characteristics. These modes are traditional frother mode, which involves the direct addition of liquid Sec-Octyl alcohol (2-octanol) to slurry, and a novel addition mode, which injects 2-octanol vapor into the bubbles. Compared with the traditional mode, the vapor addition mode produced a higher concentrate yield, lower ash content, and higher combustible matter recovery. This result suggests that the vapor addition mode facilitates the larger product yield, producing a cleaner coal product. The consumption of 2-octanol under the liquid addition mode was reduced by 53.57% compared with that under the vapor mode to achieve 83% recovery of combustible matter. In the first 0.5 min and last 1.0 min of the 3 min flotation time, the vapor addition mode showed a slower flotation rate, whereas in the middle 1.5 min, the rate was faster. In addition, the vapor addition mode led to a smaller bubble size, critical coalescence concentration (CCC), and 23.21% reduction in 2-octanol consumption to achieve a constant bubble size. The higher capture probability of hydrophobic coal particles presented by the vapor addition mode is considered the fundamental cause for the enhanced clean coal yield and combustible matter recovery. With the increase in frother dosage, the particle-bubble collision probability was identified as the main factor determining the increase in the ash content of the concentrate at a concentration below the CCC. At a concentration above the CCC, the viscosity of bubble surfaces became the main factor. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DESULFURIZATION OF COAL BY MICROBIAL COLUMN FLOTATION
    OHMURA, N
    SAIKI, H
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1994, 44 (01) : 125 - 131
  • [32] Behavior of coal particles in column flotation
    Fujimoto, H
    Matsukata, M
    Ueyama, K
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 1999, 32 (03) : 322 - 327
  • [33] FLOTATION COLUMN FOR FINE COAL BENEFICIATION
    REDDY, PSR
    KUMAR, SG
    BHATTACHARYYA, KK
    SASTRI, SRS
    NARASIMHAN, KS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 1988, 24 (1-2) : 161 - 172
  • [34] FLOW CHARACTERIZATION OF A FLOTATION COLUMN
    PAL, R
    MASLIYAH, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1989, 67 (06): : 916 - 923
  • [35] Fine coal beneficiation by column flotation
    Han, Oh-Hyung
    Kim, Min-Kyu
    Kim, Byoung-Gon
    Subasinghe, Nimal
    Park, Chul-Hyun
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 126 : 49 - 59
  • [36] Evaluation of frother performance in coal flotation: A critical review of existing methodologies
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Dey, Shobhana
    MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY REVIEW, 2008, 29 (04): : 275 - 298
  • [37] PICOBUBBLE COLUMN FLOTATION OF FINE COAL
    Tao, Daniel
    Yu, Samuel
    Zhou, Xiaohua
    Honaker, R. Q.
    Parekh, B. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2008, 28 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [38] Floc-flotation of ultrafine coal slimes achieved by flotation column
    Tian, Quanzhi
    Zhang, Yi
    Li, Guosheng
    Wang, Yongtian
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2017, 39 (09) : 899 - 904
  • [39] Effect of fine solids and frother on gas hold-up and liquid mixing in a flotation column
    Ityokumbul, M.T.
    Kosaric, N.
    Bulani, W.
    Minerals Engineering, 1995, 8 (11): : 1369 - 1380
  • [40] Erratum to: Effect of various gases on the column flotation of fine coal
    A. Raichur
    X. H. Wang
    B. K. Parekh
    Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1998, 15 : 65 - 65