Local regulation and land-use change: The effects of wetlands bylaws in Massachusetts

被引:12
作者
Sims, Katharine R. E. [1 ]
Schuetz, Jenny [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amherst Coll, Dept Econ, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
[2] NYU, Furman Ctr Real Estate & Urban Policy, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] CUNY City Coll, Dept Econ, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Open space; Land use; Urban policy; OPEN SPACE; GROWTH CONTROLS; PRICE; REDEVELOPMENT; DETERMINANTS; MODEL; EXTERNALITIES; INSTITUTIONS; CONVERSION; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.12.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As urban areas across the U.S. grow, open-space lands providing wildlife habitat and ecosystem services are lost to development. In response, many communities have experimented with local regulations to encourage land conservation, but little is known about their effects on land-use change or housing supply. Wetlands protection bylaws are a potentially important and highly controversial form of local land-use regulation in Massachusetts. This paper uses conditional variation in the timing of adoption of these bylaws across communities to analyze their effects on rates of land-use change and housing growth from 1971 to 1999. We find that bylaws significantly reduced the rate of land conversion from open space to residential uses in communities where they were enacted, but did not significantly reduce growth in housing units. housing values or housing density in those communities. We do not find strong evidence that land-use conversion was displaced to neighboring communities, but supply constraints may have encouraged additional development at alternate sites within communities or additional higher density housing development in communities where it was allowed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 421
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Altshuler A.A., 1993, REGULATION REVENUE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, REAL ESTATE ECON, V9, P321, DOI DOI 10.1111/reec.1981.9.issue-4
[3]  
[Anonymous], W12601 NBER
[4]   A general equilibrium spatial model of housing quality and quantity [J].
Arnott, R ;
Braid, R ;
Davidson, R ;
Pines, D .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (03) :283-316
[5]   The property tax as a tax on value: Deadweight loss [J].
Arnott, R ;
Petrova, P .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2006, 13 (2-3) :241-266
[6]  
*BOST GLOB, 1988, BREWST VOT PUT COMM
[7]   Spatial growth and redevelopment with perfect foresight and durable housing [J].
Braid, RM .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 49 (03) :425-452
[8]  
Brown SC, 2001, WETLANDS, V21, P508, DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0508:EOCWMI]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Infrastructure financing and urban development: The economics of impact fees [J].
Brueckner, JK .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1997, 66 (03) :383-407