Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers

被引:41
作者
Zanagnolo, Vanna [1 ]
Garbi, Annalisa [1 ]
Achilarre, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Minig, Lucas [2 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Dept Gynecol, Milan, Italy
[2] Inst Valenciano Oncol, Dept Gynecol, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Cervical cancer; Cost-effective analysis; Endometrial cancer; Gynecologic cancers; Learning curve; Minimally invasive surgery; Ovarian cancer; Robotic surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RECURRENT OVARIAN-CANCER; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Robotic-assisted surgery is a technological advancement that facilitates the application of minimally invasive techniques for complex operations in gynecologic oncology. The objective of this article was to review the literature regarding the role of robotic-assisted surgery to treat women with gynecologic cancers. The majority of publications on robotic surgery are still retrospective or descriptive in nature; however, the data for managing patients with a robotic-assisted approach show comparable, and at times improved, outcomes compared with both laparoscopy (2-dimensional) and laparotomy approaches. Robotic-assisted surgery has been used for patients with endometrial cancer and resulted in the increased use of minimally invasive surgery with improved outcomes compared with laparotomy and partially with laparoscopy. This has been shown in large cohorts of patients as well as in obese patients in whom the complication rates have significantly decreased. For early cervical cancer, robotic radical hysterectomy seems to be safe and feasible and to be preferable to laparotomy with seemingly comparable oncologic outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy to stage women with early-stage ovarian cancer seem to have similar surgical and oncologic outcomes, with a shorter learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery. However, robotic-assisted surgery appears to be more expensive than laparotomy and traditional laparoscopy. In conclusion, robotic-assisted surgery appears to facilitate the surgical approach for complex operations to treat women with gynecologic cancers. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking to further elucidate the equivalence of robot assisted surgery with conventional methods in terms of oncologic outcome and patients' quality of life, the technology appears to be safe and effective and could offer a minimally invasive approach to a much larger group of patients. (C) 2017 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 396
页数:18
相关论文
共 126 条
[51]   Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: A comparative study at a single institution [J].
Ko, Emily M. ;
Muto, Michael G. ;
Berkowitz, Ross S. ;
Feltmate, Colleen M. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :425-430
[52]   Robotic Surgery Gynecologic Oncology [J].
Krill, Lauren S. ;
Bristow, Robert E. .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (02) :167-176
[53]   Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience [J].
Lambaudie, Eric ;
Narducci, Fabrice ;
Leblanc, Eric ;
Bannier, Marie ;
Jauffret, Camille ;
Cannone, Francesco ;
Houvenaeghel, Gilles .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (09) :2430-2435
[54]   Robotically-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: Report of three first cases [J].
Lambaudie, Eric ;
Narducci, Fabrice ;
Leblanc, Eric ;
Bannier, Marie ;
Houvenaeghel, Gilles .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) :582-583
[55]   Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer [J].
Landoni, F ;
Maneo, A ;
Colombo, A ;
Placa, F ;
Milani, R ;
Perego, P ;
Favini, G ;
Ferri, L ;
Mangioni, C .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9077) :535-540
[56]   Outcomes and Cost Comparisons After Introducing a Robotics Program for Endometrial Cancer Surgery [J].
Lau, Susie ;
Vaknin, Zvi ;
Ramana-Kumar, Agnihotram V. ;
Halliday, Darron ;
Franco, Eduardo L. ;
Gotlieb, Walter H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) :717-724
[57]   Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancers [J].
Leitao, Mario M., Jr. ;
Bartashnik, Aleksandra ;
Wagner, Isaac ;
Lee, Stephen J. ;
Caroline, Ari ;
Hoskins, William J. ;
Thaler, Howard T. ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. ;
Sonoda, Yukio ;
Brown, Carol L. ;
Jewell, Elizabeth L. ;
Barakat, Richard R. ;
Gardner, Ginger J. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (05) :1031-1037
[58]   What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? [J].
Lenihan, John P., Jr. ;
Kovanda, Carol ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) :589-594
[59]   A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: A case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients [J].
Lim, Peter C. ;
Kang, Elizabeth ;
Park, Do Hwan .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 120 (03) :413-418
[60]   Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: A case report [J].
Lim, Peter C. W. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 115 (02) :310-311