Robot-assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Cancers

被引:41
作者
Zanagnolo, Vanna [1 ]
Garbi, Annalisa [1 ]
Achilarre, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Minig, Lucas [2 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Dept Gynecol, Milan, Italy
[2] Inst Valenciano Oncol, Dept Gynecol, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Cervical cancer; Cost-effective analysis; Endometrial cancer; Gynecologic cancers; Learning curve; Minimally invasive surgery; Ovarian cancer; Robotic surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RECURRENT OVARIAN-CANCER; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Robotic-assisted surgery is a technological advancement that facilitates the application of minimally invasive techniques for complex operations in gynecologic oncology. The objective of this article was to review the literature regarding the role of robotic-assisted surgery to treat women with gynecologic cancers. The majority of publications on robotic surgery are still retrospective or descriptive in nature; however, the data for managing patients with a robotic-assisted approach show comparable, and at times improved, outcomes compared with both laparoscopy (2-dimensional) and laparotomy approaches. Robotic-assisted surgery has been used for patients with endometrial cancer and resulted in the increased use of minimally invasive surgery with improved outcomes compared with laparotomy and partially with laparoscopy. This has been shown in large cohorts of patients as well as in obese patients in whom the complication rates have significantly decreased. For early cervical cancer, robotic radical hysterectomy seems to be safe and feasible and to be preferable to laparotomy with seemingly comparable oncologic outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy to stage women with early-stage ovarian cancer seem to have similar surgical and oncologic outcomes, with a shorter learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery. However, robotic-assisted surgery appears to be more expensive than laparotomy and traditional laparoscopy. In conclusion, robotic-assisted surgery appears to facilitate the surgical approach for complex operations to treat women with gynecologic cancers. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking to further elucidate the equivalence of robot assisted surgery with conventional methods in terms of oncologic outcome and patients' quality of life, the technology appears to be safe and effective and could offer a minimally invasive approach to a much larger group of patients. (C) 2017 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 396
页数:18
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: A Modern Approach to Surgical Staging [J].
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2014, 12 (02) :288-297
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, DOI [10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.058, DOI 10.1016/J.AJ0G.2008.06.058]
[3]   Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction [J].
Arms, Richard G., III ;
Sun, Charlotte C. ;
Burzawa, Jennifer K. ;
Fleming, Nicole D. ;
Nick, Alpa M. ;
Rallapalli, Vijayashri ;
Westin, Shannon N. ;
Meyer, Larissa A. ;
Ramirez, Pedro T. ;
Soliman, Pamela T. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 138 (03) :727-730
[4]   Cost Comparison Among Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer [J].
Barnett, Jason C. ;
Judd, John P. ;
Wu, Jennifer M. ;
Scales, Charles D., Jr. ;
Myers, Evan R. ;
Havrilesky, Laura J. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) :685-693
[5]   Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: A matched case-control study [J].
Beiner, M. E. ;
Hauspy, J. ;
Rosen, B. ;
Murphy, J. ;
Laframbolse, S. ;
Nofech-Mozes, S. ;
Ismii, N. ;
Rasty, G. ;
Khalifa, M. A. ;
Covens, A. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (02) :168-171
[6]  
Benedet JL, 2000, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V70, P209
[7]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[8]   The Safety and Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Lymph Node Staging in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer [J].
Brown, John V., III ;
Mendivil, Alberto A. ;
Abaid, Lisa N. ;
Rettenmaier, Mark A. ;
Micha, John P. ;
Wabe, Marie A. ;
Goldstein, Bram H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (08) :1493-1498
[9]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265
[10]   Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer [J].
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel ;
Shepherd, Amanda ;
Momeni, Mazdak ;
Mandeli, John ;
Chuang, Linus ;
Gretz, Herbert ;
Fishman, David ;
Rahaman, Jamal ;
Randall, Thomas .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (02) :160.e1-160.e11