Measuring prospective teachers' professional self-concept

被引:13
作者
Retelsdorf, Jan [1 ]
Bauer, Johannes [3 ]
Gebauer, S. Kristina [2 ]
Kauper, Tabea [1 ]
Moeller, Jens [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Padag Nat Wissensch & Math, Erziehungswissensch PPM, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol Psychol Padagogen, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Educ, D-80333 Munich, Germany
来源
DIAGNOSTICA | 2014年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
professional self-concept; teaching; questionnaire; OF-FIT INDEXES; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; INTERNAL/EXTERNAL FRAME; REFERENCE MODEL; MOTIVATION; SELECTION; NUMBER; IMPACT; WORK;
D O I
10.1026/0012-1924/a000108
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This research aimed to develop a questionnaire measuring professional self-concept for teaching. Drawing on a sample of N = 484 teacher students, in Study 1 we identified six dimensions of self-concept applying exploratory factor analyses: self-concept for subject, innovation, media use, diagnostics, education, and consulting. In Study 2, this factor structure was replicated applying confirmatory factor analyses drawing on a sample ofN = 5 802 teacher students. In both studies, internal consistencies of all dimensions were sufficient (alpha >= .71). Moreover, measurement invariance for gender, education program (teachers for academic vs. non-academic track schools), study phase, and across time was supported. Mean comparisons between gender and education programs as well as correlations with the motivation for choosing teacher education and grades also supported the validity of our self-concept scales. Altogether, our questionnaire seems to be a promising measure for multidimensional professional self-concepts for teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 110
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BEITRAGE HOCHSCHULFO
[2]   Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) :397-438
[3]  
Baumert J., 2011, Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkraften. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV, P29, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-00908-3_13
[4]  
Baumert J, 2006, Z ERZIEHWISS, V9, P469, DOI 10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2
[5]  
Bromme R., 1997, ENZYKLOP DIE PSYCHOL, P177
[6]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.19030/AJBE.V6I3.7818
[7]  
Bruder S., 2011, UNTERRICHTSWISSENSCH, V39, P123
[8]   TESTING FOR THE EQUIVALENCE OF FACTOR COVARIANCE AND MEAN STRUCTURES - THE ISSUE OF PARTIAL MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE [J].
BYRNE, BM ;
SHAVELSON, RJ ;
MUTHEN, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) :456-466
[9]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[10]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255