How does spatial resolution affect model performance? A case for ensemble approaches for marine benthic mesophotic communities

被引:12
作者
Turner, Joseph A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Babcock, Russell C. [3 ,4 ]
Kendrick, Gary A. [1 ,2 ]
Hovey, Renae K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biol Sci, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Oceans Inst, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Indian Ocean Marine Res Ctr, CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Crawley, WA, Australia
[4] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
coral; grid size; macroalgae; resolution; spatial grain; spatial scale; species distribution modelling; sponges; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; DISTRIBUTIONS; CONSERVATION; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1111/jbi.13581
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim To investigate how changing grid size can alter model predictions of the distribution of mesophotic taxa and how it affects different modelling methods. Location Ningaloo Marine Park, Western Australia. Taxon Benthic mesophotic taxa: corals, macroalgae and sponges. Methods We determined the distributions of the major benthic taxonomic groups: corals, macroalgae and sponges, using a number of modelling techniques and an ensemble using the 'sdm' R package. A range of grid sizes were used (10, 50, 100 and 250 m) to identify how model predictions were altered. Models were evaluated using the area under the curve of a receiver operator characteristic plot (AUC) and the true skill statistic (TSS) using a spatially independent dataset. Results Grid size had a large effect on model performance across the taxonomic groups. Model outputs were compared to null surfaces and 88.8% of models performed significantly better than null. Distribution of corals was best predicted using the finest grid size (10 m) regardless of modelling method, although a model ensemble produced the best results (AUC = 0.80, TSS = 0.52). Macroalgae and sponges were better predicted at coaster grids sizes (250 m). Again, ensembles performed well for both macroalgae (AUC = 0.83, TSS = 0.63) and sponges (AUC = 0.88, TSS = 0.66). Model ensembles maintained high accuracy across grid sizes and were consistently the best, or second-best, performing method. Main conclusions This study has shown how grid size should be considered when producing distribution models. Identifying the most relevant grid size and being aware of the influence it may have will provide more accurate predictions of the distributions of taxa. Ensemble methods maintained good performance across scenarios and thus provide a useful tool for conservation and management especially where single modelling methods showed high levels of variability.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1259
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS)
    Allouche, Omri
    Tsoar, Asaf
    Kadmon, Ronen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) : 1223 - 1232
  • [2] Conservation of marine biodiversity on a very large deep continental margin: how representative is a very large offshore reserve network for deep-water octocorals?
    Althaus, Franziska
    Williams, Alan
    Alderslade, Philip
    Schlacher, Thomas A.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2017, 23 (01) : 90 - 103
  • [3] Relevance of multiple spatial scales in habitat models: A case study with amphibians and grasshoppers
    Altmoos, Michael
    Henle, Klaus
    [J]. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (06): : 548 - 560
  • [4] Comment on "Tracking the global footprint of fisheries"
    Amoroso, R. O.
    Parma, A. M.
    Pitcher, C. R.
    McConnaughey, R. A.
    Jennings, S.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2018, 361 (6404)
  • [5] [Anonymous], COMM MAR RES REV
  • [6] [Anonymous], FINAL REPORT PROJECT
  • [7] [Anonymous], IEEE P OCEANS 2015 G
  • [8] Ensemble forecasting of species distributions
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    New, Mark
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [9] Use of Coarse-Resolution Models of Species' Distributions to Guide Local Conservation Inferences
    Barbosa, A. Marcia
    Real, Raimundo
    Vargas, J. Mario
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (05) : 1378 - 1387
  • [10] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32