A decision support system for institutional support to farmers in the face of climate change challenges in Limpopo province

被引:5
|
作者
Kephe, Priscilla Ntuchu [1 ,2 ]
Ayisi, Kingsley Kwabena [2 ]
Petja, Brilliant Mareme [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limpopo, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Private Bag X1106, ZA-0727 Sovenga, Polokwane, South Africa
[2] Univ Limpopo, Risk & Vulnerabil Sci Ctr, Private Bag X1106, ZA-0727 Sovenga, South Africa
[3] Water Res Commiss, Private Bag X03, ZA-0031 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Geography; Environmental sciences; Agricultural sciences; Institutional support; Adaptive capacity; Support institution; Cooperative governance; Climate change; SOUTH-AFRICA; FOOD SECURITY; SMALLHOLDER IRRIGATION; ADAPTATION; VULNERABILITY; INFORMATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04989
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Smallholder farmers in South Africa continue to be affected by the changing climate despite the existence of support to improve their adaptive capacity. This study focused on the institutional support systems and support types available to farmers in agro-ecological zones of Limpopo Province and assessed support types best suited to each area. Six hundred farmers were purposively sampled across the agro-ecological zones of Limpopo and interviewed. Support types looked at included monetary, machinery, seeds, educational support and others (irrigation scheme, animals, fertilizer, pesticides). Supporting institutions included Agro finance institutions, DAFF, Banks, and NGOs. Results showed that 70.01% of farmers received support from DAFF 25.60% from NGO's and 4.39% from Agro finance institutions. The most number of support received was two types 33.3% of the farmers. The result from the ANOVA showed that there were no significant differences in the level of difficulty experienced by farmers in accessing the various support institutions across the agro-ecological zones. In terms of the various support types received, there was a statistically significant difference in seeds (p = 0.002 < alpha = 0.05) and educational (p = 0.0001 < alpha = 0.05) support received between the different areas. Furthermore, the support needs varied across zones with farmers in arid-zone needing machinery, education, seeds and lastly monetary support while the semi-arid zone needed machinery, education, others, seeds, monetary and the humid, machinery, education, others, money and seeds. It is therefore recommended that support for farmers should be location-specific in order to enhance the adaptive capacity of an area and not be based only on the availability of certain support. There is a need for proper coordination between institutions in their aim to assist farmers to cope with climate
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Examining the role of institutional support in enhancing smallholder oilseed producers' adaptability to climate change in Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Kephe, Priscilla Ntuchu
    Petja, Brilliant Mareme
    Ayisi, Kingsley Kwabena
    OCL-OILSEEDS AND FATS CROPS AND LIPIDS, 2021, 28
  • [2] Farmers' constraints, governmental support and climate change adaptation: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Ying
    Findlay, Christopher
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 63 (04) : 866 - 880
  • [3] A geospatial decision support system to support policy implementation on climate change in EU
    Bonfante, A.
    Monaco, E.
    Vitale, A.
    Barbato, G.
    Villani, V.
    Mercogliano, P.
    Rianna, G.
    Mileti, F. A.
    Manna, P.
    Terribile, F.
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (06) : 2046 - 2057
  • [4] Vulnerability to climate change of smallholder farmers in the Hamadan province, Iran
    Jamshidi, Omid
    Asadi, Ali
    Kalantari, Khalil
    Azadi, Hossein
    Scheffran, Juergen
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 23 : 146 - 159
  • [5] Assessing high-impact spots of climate change: spatial yield simulations with Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) model
    Eitzinger, Anton
    Laderach, Peter
    Rodriguez, Beatriz
    Fisher, Myles
    Beebe, Stephen
    Sonder, Kai
    Schmidt, Axel
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2017, 22 (05) : 743 - 760
  • [6] The institutional support index: A pragmatic approach to assessing the effectiveness of institutions' climate risk management support-A case study of farming communities in Pakistan
    Khan, Nasir Abbas
    Chowdhury, Ataharul
    Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad
    Khan, Palwasha
    Alotaibi, Bader Alhafi
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2023, 42
  • [7] An integrated crop model and GIS decision support system for assisting agronomic decision making under climate change
    Kadiyala, M. D. M.
    Nedumaran, S.
    Singh, Piara
    Chukka, S.
    Irshad, Mohammad A.
    Bantilan, M. C. S.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 521 : 123 - 134
  • [8] A new decision support system to analyse the impacts of climate change on the Hungarian forestry and agricultural sectors
    Czimber, Kornel
    Galos, Borbala
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2016, 31 (07) : 664 - 673
  • [9] Coping with climate change: The role of spatial decision support tools in facilitating community adaptation
    Lieske, David J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 68 : 98 - 109
  • [10] Climate change adaptation strategies and production efficiency: The case of citrus farmers in the Limpopo province, South Africa
    Joseph, Samuel
    Antwi, Michael A.
    Chagwiza, Clarietta
    Rubhara, Theresa T.
    JAMBA-JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK STUDIES, 2021, 13