Demand Response of an Industrial Buyer considering Congestion and LMP in Day-Ahead Electricity Market

被引:2
作者
Jain, Arvind Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Agartala, Elect Engn, Agartala, Tripura, India
关键词
Stochastic linear optimization; price responsive demand shifting; electricity market; locational marginal price; optimal bidding strategy; INTEGRATED DISPATCH; GENERATION; LOAD;
D O I
10.1515/ijeeps-2017-0258
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a methodology for developing Price Responsive Demand Shifting (PRDS) based bidding strategy of an industrial buyer, who can reschedule its production plan, considering power system network constraints. Locational Marginal Price (LMP) methodology, which is being used in PJM, California, New York, and New England electricity markets, has been utilized to manage the congestion. In this work, a stochastic linear optimization formulation comprising of two sub-problems has been proposed to obtain the optimal bidding strategy of an industrial buyer considering PRDS bidding. The first sub-problem is formulated as to maximize the social welfare of market participants subject to operational constraints and security constraints to facilitate market clearing process, while the second sub-problem represents the industrial buyer's purchase cost saving maximization. The PRDS based bidding strategy, which is able to shift the demand, from high price periods to low price periods, has been obtained by solving two subproblems. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been tested on a 5-bus system and modified IEEE 30-bus system considering the hourly day-ahead market. Results obtained with the PRDS based bidding strategy have been compared with those obtained with a Conventional Price-Quantity (CPQ) bid. In simulation studies, it is observed that the PRDS approach can control the LMPs and congestion at the system buses. It is also found that PRDS can mitigate the market power by flattening the demand, which led to more saving and satisfying demand.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs [J].
Aalami, H. A. ;
Moghaddam, M. Parsa ;
Yousefi, G. R. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (01) :243-250
[2]   A summary of demand response in electricity markets [J].
Albadi, M. H. ;
El-Saadany, E. F. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2008, 78 (11) :1989-1996
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, QUANTIFYING DEMAND R
[5]  
Bompard E, 2000, 2000 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY SUMMER MEETING, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, P2229, DOI 10.1109/PESS.2000.867338
[6]   The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing [J].
Borenstein, S .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :93-116
[7]   Demand elasticity increase for reducing social welfare losses due to transfer capacity restriction: A test case on Italian cross-border imports [J].
Bruno, S ;
De Benedictis, M ;
La Scala, M ;
Wangensteen, I .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2006, 76 (6-7) :557-566
[8]   Auction design in day-ahead electricity markets (republished) [J].
Contreras, J ;
Candiles, O ;
de la Fuente, JI ;
Gómez, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (03) :409-417
[9]   Simulating oligopolistic pool-based electricity markets: A multiperiod approach [J].
de la Torre, S ;
Conejo, AJ ;
Contreras, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (04) :1547-1555
[10]   Strategic CBDR bidding considering FTR and wind power [J].
Fang, Xin ;
Li, Fangxing ;
Hu, Qinran ;
Wei, Yanli .
IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2016, 10 (10) :2464-2474