How to set the proper level of carbon tax in the context of Chinese construction sector? A CGE analysis

被引:99
作者
Shi, Qingwei [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Hong [1 ]
Cai, Weiguang [1 ,3 ]
Gao, Jingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Construct Management & Real Estate, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Res Ctr Construct Econ & Management, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, China Energy Grp, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Construction sector; Carbon tax; Carbon emissions reduction; CGE model; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-IMPACTS; BUILDING SECTOR; EMISSIONS; COMPETITIVENESS; CHALLENGES; INTENSITY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117955
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under global warming and severe environmental problems, the Paris Agreement urges China to accelerate the pace of the low-carbon economy. Improving the energy efficiency of the construction sector may be an important way to reduce CO2 emissions. As a reasonable energy policy instrument, a carbon tax can effectively improve energy efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions. In this study, a dynamic computable general equilibrium model is developed to explore the possible impacts of different carbon tax conditions on the energy consumption of the construction sector and the macroeconomy of China. Results show that the appropriate carbon tax is 60 RMB/t, which cannot only achieve the emission reduction target but also minimize the negative impact on the macroeconomy. However, the proper level of the carbon tax varies by building stage. Under the proper carbon tax level, the peak of carbon emissions could be reached in 2025. The main purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical basis for the government in formulating different energy policies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 228 MIT JOINT PROGR
[2]   The Impact of a Carbon Tax on the Chilean Electricity Generation Sector [J].
Benavides, Carlos ;
Gonzales, Luis ;
Diaz, Manuel ;
Fuentes, Rodrigo ;
Garcia, Gonzalo ;
Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo ;
Ravizza, Catalina .
ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (04) :2674-2700
[3]  
Bohringera C., 2014, SWISS J EC STAT, V150, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF03399400, 10.1007/BF03399400]
[4]   Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies [J].
Branger, Frederic ;
Quirion, Philippe .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 99 :29-39
[5]   China building energy consumption: Situation, challenges and corresponding measures [J].
Cai, W. G. ;
Wu, Y. ;
Zhong, Y. ;
Ren, H. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (06) :2054-2059
[6]   The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland [J].
Callan, Tim ;
Lyons, Sean ;
Scott, Susan ;
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
Verde, Stefano .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) :407-412
[7]   Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world [J].
Carl, Jeremy ;
Fedor, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 :50-77
[8]   Assessing direct and indirect economic impacts of a flood event through the integration of spatial and computable general equilibrium modelling [J].
Carrera, Lorenzo ;
Standardi, Gabriele ;
Bosello, Francesco ;
Mysiak, Jaroslav .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 63 :109-122
[9]   The energy price equivalence of carbon taxes and emissions trading-Theory and evidence [J].
Chiu, Fan-Ping ;
Kuo, Hsiao-I. ;
Chen, Chi-Chung ;
Hsu, Chia-Sheng .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 160 :164-171
[10]   The impacts of China's household consumption expenditure patterns on energy demand and carbon emissions towards 2050 [J].
Dai, Hancheng ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Matsuoka, Yuzuru ;
Fujimori, Shinichiro .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 50 :736-750