Comparison of Different Impellers for Gas Dispersion in Power-Law Fluids

被引:6
作者
Hinge, Shruti P. [1 ]
Kumar, Ravi [1 ]
Patwardhan, Ashwin W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Chem Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Mumbai 400019, Maharashtra, India
来源
ACS ENGINEERING AU | 2022年 / 2卷 / 02期
关键词
gas holdup; CFD; stirred tank; regime transition; non-Newtonian; TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS; LIQUID MASS-TRANSFER; HOLD-UP; BUBBLE-SIZE; FLOW; REACTORS; PROBE; TRANSITION; SIMULATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00020
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The 3D multiphase computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models have been developed for gas-liquid systems in a standard baffled stirred tank reactor (diameter 0.3 m) for non-Newtonian power-law fluids. The standard k-e model has been used to model the turbulence, and drag has been modeled with the Grace drag model with Brucato modifications. CFD simulations have been carried out for three impellers, namely, the Rushton turbine, pitched blade turbine, and hydrofoil impeller. The effects of impeller design, power input per unit volume of the fluid (P/V) (12005200 W/m3), fluid rheology (K = 0-0.1561 Pa center dot sn, n = 0.687-1.000), and superficial gas velocity (7.1-28.3 mm/s) have been analyzed. The CFD model has been validated with the local distribution of axial, radial, and tangential velocities and overall gas holdup data reported in the literature. The CFD model has been used to predict the regime transition from flooding to loading and complete dispersion. A good agreement was observed for the prediction of regime transition for the Rushton turbine when compared with the experimental data. The average value of absolute error for the prediction of the gas holdup is 20%, which indicates that the developed CFD model can be successfully used to predict the gas holdup and regime transition in stirred tank reactors. Among the impellers studied, the hydrofoil impeller shows the highest gas holdup and uniform gas distribution in the vessel at low power consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 91
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Agostini E, 2019, Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Flows in Stirred Tanks: Application to Bio-Reactors
[2]   Bubble size in aerated stirred tanks [J].
Alves, SS ;
Maia, CI ;
Vasconcelos, JMT ;
Serralheiro, AJ .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2002, 89 (1-3) :109-117
[3]   Three-phase CFD simulation coupled with population balance equations of anaerobic syntrophic acidogenesis and methanogenesis reactions in a continuous stirred bioreactor [J].
Azargoshasb, H. ;
Mousavi, S. M. ;
Amani, T. ;
Jafari, A. ;
Nosrati, M. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2015, 27 :207-217
[4]   Evaluation of mixing and mass transfer in a stirred pilot scale bioreactor utilizing CFD [J].
Bach, Christian ;
Yang, Jifeng ;
larsson, HilDe ;
Stocks, Stuart M. ;
Gernaey, Krist V. ;
Albaek, Mads O. ;
Kruhne, Ulrich .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2017, 171 :19-26
[5]   BUBBLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS IN A MECHANICALLY AGITATED GAS-LIQUID CONTACTOR [J].
BARIGOU, M ;
GREAVES, M .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1992, 47 (08) :2009-2025
[6]  
Bird R.B., 2007, Transport phenomena, V2nd ed.
[7]   Gas-filled cavity structures and local void fraction distribution in vessel with dual-impellers [J].
Bombac, A ;
Zun, I .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2000, 55 (15) :2995-3001
[8]   Particle drag coefficients in turbulent fluids [J].
Brucato, A ;
Grisafi, F ;
Montante, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1998, 53 (18) :3295-3314
[9]  
Brunazzi E, 2002, CAN J CHEM ENG, V80, P688
[10]   Flooding Characteristics of Hydrofoil Impeller in a Two- and Three-phase Stirred Tank [J].
Cai Qingbai ;
Dai Gance .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 18 (03) :355-361