Group Decision Making with Transitive Preferences Under Ordinal and Cardinal Consistencies: An Optimization Approach

被引:12
作者
Wu, Zhibin [1 ]
Yuan, Rong [1 ]
Tu, Jiancheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, 24,South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ordinal consistency; Additive consistency; Consensus; Transitivity; Linear integer programming; IMPROVING CONSISTENCY; ADDITIVE CONSISTENCY; CONSENSUS MODEL; INCONSISTENCIES; FRAMEWORK; TAXONOMY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-020-09714-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
With the ubiquity of preference relations used in group decision making (GDM), controlling the transitivity of preferences characterized by individual consistency has attracted much attention. However, few previous studies consider ordinal and cardinal consistencies simultaneously and the ordinal consistency is often ignored in consensus reaching process in existing studies. In this study, the conditions of individual ordinal consistency are proved to be equivalent to a series of inequalities, based on which, an optimization model is developed to deal with the ordinal inconsistency problem. In addition, a second optimization model is proposed to address the coexistence of both ordinal and cardinal inconsistencies. A framework is designed to provide a complete strategy for controlling consistency. Such a framework is also generalized to accommodate the consensus problem in GDM. Comparing to the existing consistency improvement approaches, the proposed approach explicitly solves the ordinal consistency problem by an optimization approach. Furthermore, the proposed group consensus model guarantees both ordinal consistency and acceptable cardinal consistency when consensus is achieved. Finally, classical examples with extensive comparisons are conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 250
页数:30
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Investigating rank reversal in reciprocal fuzzy preference relation based on additive consistency: Causes and solutions
    Al Salem, Aqeel Asaad
    Awasthi, Anjali
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 115 : 573 - 581
  • [2] On the transitivity and consistency approximated thresholds of some consistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices
    Amenta, Pietro
    Lucadamo, Antonio
    Marcarelli, Gabriella
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 507 (507) : 274 - 287
  • [3] Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: A heuristic approach
    Cao, D.
    Leung, L. C.
    Law, J. S.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 44 (04) : 944 - 953
  • [4] Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Lin, Tsung-En
    Lee, Li-Wei
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 259 : 1 - 15
  • [5] Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making
    Cheng, Dong
    Cheng, Faxin
    Zhou, Zhili
    Wu, Yong
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 : 30 - 43
  • [6] Transitivity of preferences: When does it matter?
    Cherchye, Laurens
    Demuynck, Thomas
    De Rock, Bram
    [J]. THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 13 (03): : 1043 - 1076
  • [7] A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making
    Chiclana, F.
    Tapia Garcia, J. M.
    del Moral, M. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 221 : 110 - 123
  • [8] A hybrid group decision making framework for achieving agreed solutions based on stable opinions
    Dong, Qingxing
    Zhou, Xin
    Martinez, Luis
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 490 : 227 - 243
  • [9] Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method
    Dong, Yucheng
    Zhang, Guiqing
    Hong, Wei-Chiang
    Xu, Yinfeng
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 49 (03) : 281 - 289
  • [10] Faramondi L, 2020, ARXIV190404701V2