Evaluating Two Techniques on Removal of Fractured Rotary Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments from Root Canals: An In Vitro Study

被引:31
作者
Alomairy, Khalid H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Endodontol, Inst Odontol, S-14151 Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
Instrument removal; operating microscope; separated instrument; ultrasonics; ULTRASONIC TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL-USE; SYSTEMS; EFFICIENCY; DEFECTS; FILES;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the ultrasonic technique (US) and instrument removal system (iRS) in removing fractured rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) from root canals. A total of 30 extracted human molars with closed apices were collected. Profile .06 taper rotary endodontic instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) 25-mm long and ISO size 25 were driven into the mesial canal to be fractured in the curve. Angles and radii of curvature were measured for all the canals with the fractured fragments, and then canals were classified into slight, moderate, and severe subgroups according to their curvature angles. Within each subgroup, teeth were randomly distributed into LIS or iRS according to measured angles and radii; a total of 15 canals were assigned to both US and iRS techniques. The overall success rate was 70% (n = 21). Less Curved canals and longer radii of curvature showed more success. The median time used for retrieval was 40 minutes using the US technique, whereas it was 55 minutes for iRS. The removal of fractured rotary NiTi endodontic instruments was more successful with less curved canals and longer radius of curvature above 4.4 mm. (J Endod 2009;35:559-562)
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 562
页数:4
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo [J].
Al-Fouzan, KS .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2003, 36 (12) :864-867
[2]  
Bryant ST, 1998, INT ENDOD J, V31, P275
[3]  
Carr G B, 1992, J Calif Dent Assoc, V20, P55
[4]   RELATIONSHIP OF BROKEN ROOT CANAL INSTRUMENTS TO ENDODONTIC CASE PROGNOSIS - A CLINICAL INVESTIGATION [J].
CRUMP, MC ;
NATKIN, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1970, 80 (06) :1341-+
[5]   Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm [J].
Daugherty, DW ;
Gound, TG ;
Comer, TL .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (02) :93-95
[6]   A METHOD FOR THE REMOVAL OF BROKEN ENDODONTIC INSTRUMENTS FROM ROOT CANALS [J].
FORS, UGH ;
BERG, JO .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1983, 9 (04) :156-159
[7]  
Gambarini G, 2000, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V16, P95
[8]   GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION OF FRACTURE OF ROOT CANAL INSTRUMENTS [J].
GROSSMAN, LI .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1969, 28 (05) :746-&
[9]   Ultrasonic vibration: temperature rise on external root surface during broken instrument removal [J].
Hashem, Ahmed Abdel Rahman .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (09) :1070-1073
[10]  
Hülsmann M, 1999, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V15, P252