Crowdsourcing: a systematic review of the literature using text mining

被引:23
作者
Pavlidou, Ioanna [1 ]
Papagiannidis, Savvas [2 ]
Tsui, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Business, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Crowdsourcing; Crowdfunding; Crowd venturing; Systematic literature review; Innovation; New product development; Platforms; Projects; Collective intelligence; Wisdom of the crowd; BUSINESS MODELS; OPEN INNOVATION; CROWD LABOR; KNOWLEDGE; CONTESTS; PARTICIPATION; DETERMINANTS; CONSEQUENCES; PERSPECTIVES; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0474
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose This study is a systematic literature review of crowdsourcing that aims to present the research evidence so far regarding the extent to which it can contribute to organisational performance and produce innovations and provide insights on how organisations can operationalise it successfully. Design/methodology/approach The systematic literature review revolved around a text mining methodology analysing 106 papers. Findings The themes identified are performance, innovation, operational aspects and motivations. The review revealed a few potential directions for future research in each of the themes considered. Practical implications This study helps researchers to consider the recent themes on crowdsourcing and identify potential areas for research. At the same time, it provides practitioners with an understanding of the usefulness and process of crowdsourcing and insights on what the critical elements are in order to organise a successful crowdsourcing project. Originality/value This study employed quantitative content analysis in order to identify the main research themes with higher reliability and validity. It is also the first review on crowdsourcing that incorporates the relevant literature on crowdfunding as a value-creation tool.
引用
收藏
页码:2041 / 2065
页数:25
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]   Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing challenges for innovation [J].
Acar, Oguz A. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (08)
[2]   CROWDSOURCING AS A SOLUTION TO DISTANT SEARCH [J].
Afuah, Allan ;
Tucci, Christopher L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (03) :355-375
[3]   CROWDFUNDING: GEOGRAPHY, SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND THE TIMING OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
Catalini, Christian ;
Goldfarb, Avi .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2015, 24 (02) :253-274
[4]   Motivating participation in crowdsourced policymaking: The interplay of epistemic and interactive aspects [J].
Aitamurto T. ;
Saldivar J. .
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2017, 1 (CSCW)
[5]  
Aitamurto T., 2015, International Journal of Communication, V9, P21
[6]   An information-theoretic perspective of tf-idf measures [J].
Aizawa, A .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2003, 39 (01) :45-65
[7]   NEWS ORGANIZATIONS 2.0 A comparative study of Twitter news [J].
Al-Rawi, Ahmed .
JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2017, 11 (06) :705-720
[8]  
Alfiero S., 2014, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, V4, P46
[9]   Design Crowdsourcing: The Impact on New Product Performance of Sourcing Design Solutions from the "Crowd" [J].
Allen, B. J. ;
Chandrasekaran, Deepa ;
Basuroy, Suman .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2018, 82 (02) :106-123
[10]   Turkers of the World Unite: Multilevel In-Group Bias Among Crowdworkers on Amazon Mechanical Turk [J].
Almaatouq, Abdullah ;
Krafft, Peter ;
Dunham, Yarrow ;
Rand, David G. ;
Pentland, Alex .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (02) :151-159