Layer Stacking: A Novel Algorithm for Individual Forest Tree Segmentation from LiDAR Point Clouds

被引:125
作者
Ayrey, Elias [1 ]
Fraver, Shawn [1 ]
Kershaw, John A., Jr. [2 ]
Kenefic, Laura S. [3 ]
Hayes, Daniel [1 ]
Weiskittel, Aaron R. [1 ]
Roth, Brian E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Sch Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[2] Univ New Brunswick, Fac Forestry & Environm Management, POB 4400,28 Dineen Dr, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
[3] US Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, Bradley, ME 04411 USA
[4] Univ Maine, Cooperat Forest Res Unit, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469 USA
关键词
VARIABLE WINDOW SIZE; SINGLE-TREE; AIRBORNE; HEIGHT; EXTRACTION; AREA; CROWNS;
D O I
10.1080/07038992.2017.1252907
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
As light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology advances, it has become common for datasets to be acquired at a point density high enough to capture structural information from individual trees. To process these data, an automatic method of isolating individual trees from a LiDAR point cloud is required. Traditional methods for segmenting trees attempt to isolate prominent tree crowns from a canopy height model. We here introduce a novel segmentation method, layer stacking, which slices the entire forest point cloud at 1-m height intervals and isolates trees in each layer. Merging the results from all layers produces representative tree profiles. When compared to watershed delineation (a widely used segmentation algorithm), layer stacking correctly identified 15% more trees in unevenaged conifer stands, 7%-17% more in even-aged conifer stands, 26% more in mixedwood stands, and 26%-30% more (with 75% of trees correctly detected) in pure deciduous stands. Overall, layer stacking's commission error was mostly similar to or better than that of watershed delineation. Layer stacking performed particularly well in deciduous, leaf-off conditions, even those where tree crowns were less prominent. We conclude that in the tested forest types, layer stacking represents an improvement in segmentation when compared to existing algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 27
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], KDD
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, P LASER SCANNING 200
  • [4] Breast Height Diameter Estimation From High-Density Airborne LiDAR Data
    Bucksch, Alexander
    Lindenbergh, Roderik
    Abd Rahman, Muhammad Zulkarnain
    Menenti, Massimo
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2014, 11 (06) : 1056 - 1060
  • [5] Chen Q, 2007, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V73, P109
  • [6] NASA Goddard's LiDAR, Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) Airborne Imager
    Cook, Bruce D.
    Corp, Lawrence A.
    Nelson, Ross F.
    Middleton, Elizabeth M.
    Morton, Douglas C.
    McCorkel, Joel T.
    Masek, Jeffrey G.
    Ranson, Kenneth J.
    Vuong Ly
    Montesano, Paul M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (08): : 4045 - 4066
  • [7] An efficient, multi-layered crown delineation algorithm for mapping individual tree structure across multiple ecosystems
    Duncanson, L. I.
    Cook, B. D.
    Hurtt, G. C.
    Dubayah, R. O.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 154 : 378 - 386
  • [8] Comparative Analysis of Clustering-Based Approaches for 3-D Single Tree Detection Using Airborne Fullwave Lidar Data
    Gupta, Sandeep
    Weinacker, Holger
    Koch, Barbara
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 2 (04): : 968 - 989
  • [9] Hartigan J. A., 1979, Applied Statistics, V28, P100, DOI 10.2307/2346830
  • [10] An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning
    Kaartinen, Harri
    Hyyppa, Juha
    Yu, Xiaowei
    Vastaranta, Mikko
    Hyyppa, Hannu
    Kukko, Antero
    Holopainen, Markus
    Heipke, Christian
    Hirschmugl, Manuela
    Morsdorf, Felix
    Naesset, Erik
    Pitkanen, Juho
    Popescu, Sorin
    Solberg, Svein
    Wolf, Bernd Michael
    Wu, Jee-Cheng
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 4 (04) : 950 - 974