Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians

被引:59
作者
Sloan, Melanie [1 ]
Lever, Elliott [2 ]
Harwood, Rupert [3 ]
Gordon, Caroline [4 ]
Wincup, Chris [5 ]
Blane, Moira [3 ]
Brimicombe, James [1 ]
Lanyon, Peter [6 ]
Howard, Paul [7 ]
Sutton, Stephen [1 ]
D'Cruz, David [8 ]
Naughton, Felix [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Dept Rheumatol, Harrow, Middx, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Patient & Publ Involvement Rheumatol Res Grp, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Rheumatol Res Grp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] UCL, Dept Rheumatol, London, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Populat & Lifespan Sci, Nottingham, England
[7] LUPUS UK, Romford, Essex, England
[8] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Louise Coote Lupus Unit, London, England
[9] Univ East Anglia, Behav & Implementat Sci Grp, Sch Hlth Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
telemedicine; rheumatology; patient-physician interactions; digital technology in medicine; pandemic; mixed-methods; rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases; TELERHEUMATOLOGY; COVID-19; TOOL;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keab796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine's acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. Methods Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. Results Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. Conclusion Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine's acceptability and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:2262 / 2274
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]  
Creswell JW., 2017, CHOOSING MIXED METHO
[12]   COVID-19 and rheumatology: Reflecting on the first wave and preparing for the second wave [J].
Fardanesh, Armin ;
Byravan, Swetha ;
Moorthy, Arumugam ;
Tahir, Hasan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 24 (01) :7-9
[13]   Access to primary care for socio-economically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: A qualitative study [J].
Ford, John A. ;
Turley, Rachel ;
Porter, Tom ;
Shakespeare, Tom ;
Wong, Geoff ;
Jones, Andy P. ;
Steel, Nick .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03)
[14]   Physician-patient communication in rheumatology: a systematic review [J].
Georgopoulou, Sofia ;
Prothero, Louise ;
D'Cruz, David P. .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 38 (05) :763-775
[15]   How doctors recognise that their patients are worried: A qualitative study of patient cues [J].
Giroldi, Esther ;
Timmerman, Angelique ;
Veldhuijzen, Wemke ;
Muris, Jean ;
van der Vleuten, Cees ;
van der Weijden, Trudy .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (01) :220-225
[16]   Quality of life in psoriatic arthritis [J].
Gudu, Tania ;
Gossec, Laure .
EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 14 (05) :405-417
[17]   Rapid Implementation of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives and Preferences of Patients with Cancer [J].
Hasson, Shira Peleg ;
Waissengrin, Barliz ;
Shachar, Eliya ;
Hodruj, Marah ;
Fayngor, Rochelle ;
Brezis, Mirika ;
Nikolaevski-Berlin, Alla ;
Pelles, Sharon ;
Safra, Tamar ;
Geva, Ravit ;
Wolf, Ido .
ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (04) :E679-E685
[18]   Clinician behaviors in telehealth care delivery: a systematic review [J].
Henry, Beverly W. ;
Block, Derryl E. ;
Ciesla, James R. ;
McGowan, Beth Ann ;
Vozenilek, John A. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 22 (04) :869-888
[19]   In, But Out of Touch: Connecting With Patients During the Virtual Visit [J].
Kelly, Martina Ann ;
Gormley, Gerard J. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (05) :461-462
[20]   Digital rheumatology in the era of COVID-19: results of a national patient and physician survey [J].
Kernder, Anna ;
Morf, Harriet ;
Klemm, Philipp ;
Vossen, Diana ;
Haase, Isabell ;
Mucke, Johanna ;
Meyer, Marco ;
Kleyer, Arnd ;
Sewerin, Philipp ;
Bendzuck, Gerlinde ;
Eis, Sabine ;
Knitza, Johannes ;
Krusche, Martin .
RMD OPEN, 2021, 7 (01)