Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians

被引:59
作者
Sloan, Melanie [1 ]
Lever, Elliott [2 ]
Harwood, Rupert [3 ]
Gordon, Caroline [4 ]
Wincup, Chris [5 ]
Blane, Moira [3 ]
Brimicombe, James [1 ]
Lanyon, Peter [6 ]
Howard, Paul [7 ]
Sutton, Stephen [1 ]
D'Cruz, David [8 ]
Naughton, Felix [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Dept Rheumatol, Harrow, Middx, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Patient & Publ Involvement Rheumatol Res Grp, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Rheumatol Res Grp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] UCL, Dept Rheumatol, London, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Populat & Lifespan Sci, Nottingham, England
[7] LUPUS UK, Romford, Essex, England
[8] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Louise Coote Lupus Unit, London, England
[9] Univ East Anglia, Behav & Implementat Sci Grp, Sch Hlth Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
telemedicine; rheumatology; patient-physician interactions; digital technology in medicine; pandemic; mixed-methods; rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases; TELERHEUMATOLOGY; COVID-19; TOOL;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keab796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine's acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. Methods Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. Results Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. Conclusion Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine's acceptability and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:2262 / 2274
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Use and Content of Primary Care Office-Based vs Telemedicine Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US [J].
Alexander, G. Caleb ;
Tajanlangit, Matthew ;
Heyward, James ;
Mansour, Omar ;
Qato, Dima M. ;
Stafford, Randall S. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (10)
[2]   THE ROLE OF THE RECEPTIONIST IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - A DRAGON BEHIND THE DESK [J].
ARBER, S ;
SAWYER, L .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1985, 20 (09) :911-921
[3]   Managing patients using telerheumatology: Lessons from a pandemic [J].
Bateman, James ;
Cleaton, Natasha .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01)
[4]   What's in a smile? A review of the benefits of the clinician's smile [J].
Beamish, Andrew James ;
Foster, Jessica Jane ;
Edwards, Harry ;
Olbers, Torsten .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 95 (1120) :91-95
[5]   Patient-Initiated Follow-Up (PIFU) as reorganized support for increased patient involvement - focus group discussions among patients' with inflammatory arthritis [J].
Bech, Bianca ;
Lykkegaard, Jens Jorgen ;
Lundbak, Tine ;
Schroder, Heidi Morso ;
Birkeland, Line Mette ;
Schlyter, Mette Lund ;
Hansen, Lotte Hanne ;
Dalsgaard, Lillian ;
Esbensen, Bente Appel .
BMC RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 4 (01)
[6]   Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? [J].
Birt, Linda ;
Scott, Suzanne ;
Cavers, Debbie ;
Campbell, Christine ;
Walter, Fiona .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (13) :1802-1811
[7]   Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic; a positive experience in the Netherlands [J].
Bos, Wouter H. ;
van Tubergen, Astrid ;
Vonkeman, Harald E. .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 41 (03) :565-573
[8]   COVID-19 infection in a northern-Italian cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus assessed by telemedicine [J].
Bozzalla Cassione, Emanuele ;
Zanframundo, Giovanni ;
Biglia, Alessandro ;
Codullo, Veronica ;
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio ;
Cavagna, Lorenzo .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 (10) :1382-1382
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[10]   Telemedicine in rheumatology: a reliable approach beyond the pandemic [J].
Cavagna, Lorenzo ;
Zanframundo, Giovanni ;
Codullo, Veronica ;
Pisu, Maria Grazia ;
Caporali, Roberto ;
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 60 (01) :366-370