The Anti-corruption Discourse of China: Cracking down on "Tigers"

被引:8
|
作者
Tian, Youfei [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Dept English & Literature, Kunming 650504, Yunnan, Peoples R China
关键词
(Anti-)corruption; China; Circulars of intra-Party disciplinary punishments; Critical discourse analysis; Integrated anti-corruption discourse;
D O I
10.1007/s40647-020-00303-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Fighting corruption has been a signature theme in the governance of China since Xi Jinping became General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CCCPC) in 2012. Among the extensive attention from academic and policy discourse to this unprecedented anti-corruption effort in CPC's history, there are studies that take the one-sided view that the effort under way is not anti-corruption in its strict sense as it relies on the Party mechanism rather than the legal system, scripted, and calculated for the narrow self-interest of factional power enhancement. Reviewing contemporary fundamental anti-corruption discourses, anchored in critical discourse analysis, and assisted by 134 circulars of intra-Party disciplinary punishments of corrupt high-ranking officials ("tigers", dalaohu), this interdisciplinary study reveals that, by contrast, China adopts an integrated approach to corruption, which incorporates republican and liberal-rationalist beliefs and values. Specifically, it is characterized by CCCPC as leadership, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection as political agency, both following a mentality of the rule of law, and by the coordination between intra-Party disciplinary rules and state laws. This approach is appropriate because it conceptualizes corruption by targeting the main feature of the corruption-related problem. This study contributes from a discoursal perspective to the understanding of China's anti-corruption in the Xi Jinping Era.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 610
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] China’s anti-graft campaign and international anti-corruption norms: Towards a “new international anti-corruption order”?
    Bertram Lang
    Crime, Law and Social Change, 2018, 70 : 331 - 347
  • [33] The Long Arm of Anti-corruption: Extraterritoriality and Anti-corruption Targeted Sanctions
    Zabyelina, Yuliya
    GLOBAL POLICY, 2020, 11 (04) : 535 - 540
  • [34] The Perception of Anti-corruption Efficacy in China: An Empirical Analysis
    Hui Li
    Ting Gong
    Hanyu Xiao
    Social Indicators Research, 2016, 125 : 885 - 903
  • [35] The Evolution and Development of Anti-corruption Criminal Policy in China
    Zhang, Shengying
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND BUSINESS INNOVATION (ICMIBI 2016), PT 1, 2016, 57 : 848 - 851
  • [36] Concerning the Reform and Improvement of Anti-Corruption Agency in China
    Chen, Jianxin
    Guo, Jian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PUBLIC POLICY (ICMIPP 2012), VOLS 1-6, 2012, : 1560 - 1563
  • [37] The Perception of Anti-corruption Efficacy in China: An Empirical Analysis
    Li, Hui
    Gong, Ting
    Xiao, Hanyu
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2016, 125 (03) : 885 - 903
  • [38] Corruption, anti-corruption, and economic development
    Zhang, Miao
    Zhang, Houli
    Zhang, Li
    Peng, Xu
    Zhu, Jiaxuan
    Liu, Duochenxi
    You, Shibing
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [39] Corruption and development: the anti-corruption campaigns
    Hiranandani, Vanmala
    PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2010, 10 (04) : 365 - +
  • [40] Anti-corruption sites
    Zeljak, C
    PROBLEMS OF POST-COMMUNISM, 2002, 49 (06) : 58 - 58