Lung function and respiratory symptoms in a randomized smoking cessation trial of electronic cigarettes

被引:79
作者
Cibella, Fabio [1 ]
Campagna, Davide [2 ,3 ]
Caponnetto, Pasquale [2 ,3 ]
Amaradio, Maria Domenica [3 ]
Caruso, Massimo [3 ]
Russo, Cristina [2 ,3 ]
Cockcroft, Donald W. [4 ]
Polosa, Riccardo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Biomed & Mol Immunol, Via Ugo La Malfa 153, I-90146 Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ Catania, Azienda Osped Univ Policlin V Emanuele, Ctr Prevenz & Cura Tabagismo, Via S Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[3] Univ Catania, Azienda Osped Univ Policlin V Emanuele, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Via S Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Div Respirol Crit Care & Sleep Med, 103 Hosp Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
关键词
electronic cigarettes; respiratory function tests; respiratory symptoms; smoking cessation; tobacco harm reduction; MID-EXPIRATORY FLOW; SMOKERS; REDUCTION; DECLINE; AIRWAYS; DISEASE; FEV1;
D O I
10.1042/CS20160268
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Quitting smoking is the most important step smokers can take to improve their health. Nonetheless, there is little information on long-term improvements in lung function and/or respiratory symptoms after smoking cessation. Here we illustrate long-term changes in spirometric indices as well as in respiratory symptoms in smokers invited to quit or reduce their cigarette consumption by switching to electronic cigarettes (ECs). Prospective evaluation of cigarette consumption, spirometry and symptoms was performed in a 1-year randomized controlled trial of smokers receiving EC containing 2.4%, 1.8% or 0% nicotine. Spirometric data are presented on the basis of participants' pooled continuous smoking phenotype classification (Quitters, Reducers, Failures), whereas respiratory symptoms on the basis of their point prevalence-smoking phenotype. Smoking phenotype classification (Quitters, Reducers, Failures) had no significant effect on spirometric indices (FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC) with the exception of FEF25-75%, which significantly (P = 0.034) increased over the time among Quitters; their FEF25-75% (% predicted) improving from (means +/- S.D.) 85.7 +/- 15.6% at baseline (BL) to 100.8 +/- 14.6%. High prevalence of cough/phlegm (43.1%) and shortness of breath (SoB; 34.8%) was reported at BL with substantial reduction in their frequency at subsequent follow-up visits. These symptoms virtually disappeared very quickly in both quitters and reducers. Smokers invited to switch to ECs who completely abstained from smoking showed steady progressive improvements in their FEF25-75%. Normalization of peripheral airways function was associated with improvement in respiratory symptoms, adding to the notion that abstaining from smoking can reverse tobacco harm in the lung.
引用
收藏
页码:1929 / 1937
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
[2]  
BUIST AS, 1979, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V120, P953
[3]  
BUIST AS, 1976, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V114, P115
[4]  
Campagna D., EUR J CLIN IN PRESS
[5]  
Caponnetto P, 2013, Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, V79, P12
[6]   EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as Tobacco Cigarettes Substitute: A Prospective 12-Month Randomized Control Design Study [J].
Caponnetto, Pasquale ;
Campagna, Davide ;
Cibella, Fabio ;
Morjaria, Jaymin B. ;
Caruso, Massimo ;
Russo, Cristina ;
Polosa, Riccardo .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06)
[7]   Smoking cessation: present status and future perspectives [J].
Caponnetto, Pasquale ;
Russo, Cristina ;
Polosa, Riccardo .
CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 12 (03) :229-237
[8]  
Caponnetto P, 2012, EXPERT REV RESP MED, V6, P63, DOI [10.1586/ers.11.92, 10.1586/ERS.11.92]
[9]   VOLUME ADJUSTMENT OF MAXIMAL MID-EXPIRATORY FLOW - IMPORTANCE OF CHANGES IN TOTAL LUNG CAPACITY [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
BERSCHEID, BA .
CHEST, 1980, 78 (04) :595-600
[10]   Medication compliance and persistence: Terminology and definitions [J].
Cramer, Joyce A. ;
Roy, Anuja ;
Burrell, Anita ;
Fairchild, Carol J. ;
Fuldeore, Mahesh J. ;
Ollendorf, Daniel A. ;
Wong, Peter K. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (01) :44-47