Outdoor airborne fungi captured by viable and non-viable methods

被引:36
作者
Fernandez-Rodriguez, Santiago [1 ]
Tormo-Molina, Rafael [1 ]
Maria Maya-Manzano, Jose [1 ]
Silva-Palacios, Inmaculada [2 ]
Gonzalo-Garijo, Angela [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Fac Sci, Dept Plant Biol Ecol & Earth Sci, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Engn Agr Sch, Dept Appl Phys, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Infanta Cristina, Dept Allergol, Badajoz, Spain
关键词
Aeromycology; Outdoor airborne fungi; Viable and non-viable sampling methods; SPORE CONCENTRATIONS; FILAMENTOUS FUNGI; CLADOSPORIUM; ALTERNARIA; INDOOR; LOAD; SURVEILLANCE; AEROMYCOLOGY; ATMOSPHERE; SAMPLERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.funeco.2013.11.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Volume assessments of the concentration of airborne fungi may provide different results depending on the methodology used. This work simultaneously analyses two methods for samples obtained outdoors and analysed in the context of meteorological conditions. The study was carried out in Badajoz (SW Spain) from Mar. 2009 to Jul. 2011. A Burkard fixed spore trap was used for the non-viable sampling, and three different methods were used for the viable sampling: a Burkard portable spore trap with two inlet port types and a Sampl'air AES trap. Daily average total concentrations of 285 CFU m (-3) and 1 954 spores m (-3) were recorded for the viable and non-viable methods, respectively. The spore/colony ratio showed important differences among the most relevant fungal types: Alternaria (2.6), Aspergillus-Penicillium (2.0) and Cladosporium (11.1). Although the two sampling types were essentially equivalent at showing temporal variations in outdoor airborne fungi, quantitative differences in the number of total colonies recorded depended on the culture media and conditions used. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 26
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Air-borne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations [J].
Adhikari, A ;
Sen, MM ;
Gupta-Bhattacharya, S ;
Chanda, S .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 326 (1-3) :123-141
[2]   Fungi associated with three houses in Havana (Cuba) [J].
Aira, MJ ;
Rojas, TI ;
Jato, V .
GRANA, 2002, 41 (02) :114-118
[3]  
Al-Suwaine A.S., 1999, AEROBIOLOGIA, V15, P121, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1007595400116
[4]   Seasonal incidence of airborne fungal allergens in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [J].
Al-Suwaine, AS ;
Bahkali, AH ;
Hasnain, SM .
MYCOPATHOLOGIA, 1999, 145 (01) :15-22
[5]   NEW SAMPLER FOR THE COLLECTION, SIZING, AND ENUMERATION OF VIABLE AIRBORNE PARTICLES [J].
ANDERSEN, AA .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1958, 76 (05) :471-484
[6]  
Augustowska M, 2006, ANN AGR ENV MED, V13, P99
[7]  
BOUSQUET J, 1993, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V23, P484
[8]   Demolition of a hospital building by controlled explosion:: the impact on filamentous fungal load in internal and external air [J].
Bouza, E ;
Peláez, T ;
Pérez-Molina, J ;
Marín, M ;
Alcalá, L ;
Padilla, B ;
Muñoz, P .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2002, 52 (04) :234-242
[9]  
Buczynska Alina, 2007, Medycyna Pracy, V58, P521
[10]  
Buczynska A, 2008, MED PR, V59, P373