A Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible-Dose Study of Levomilnacipran Extended-Release in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

被引:65
作者
Sambunaris, Angelo [1 ]
Bose, Anjana [2 ]
Gommoll, Carl P. [2 ]
Chen, Changzheng [2 ]
Greenberg, William M. [2 ]
Sheehan, David V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Atlanta Inst Med & Res, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Forest Res Inst, Jersey City, NJ USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
major depressive disorder; SNRI; depression; selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; antidepressants; SUSTAINED-RELEASE; RATING-SCALE; EFFICACY; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; BURDEN; MODELS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1097/JCP.0000000000000060
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Levomilnacipran (1S, 2R-milnacipran) is a potent and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; an extended-release (ER) formulation allows for once-daily dosing. This phase III study (NCT01034462) evaluated the efficacy, the safety, and the tolerability of 40 to 120 mg/d of levomilnacipran ER versus placebo in the treatment of patients (18-80 y) with major depressive disorder. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, flexible-dose study comprised a 1-week single-blind, placebo run-in period; an 8-week double-blind treatment; and a 2-week double-blind down-taper period. The primary efficacy parameter was total score change from baseline to week 8 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); the secondary efficacy was the Sheehan Disability Scale. Analysis was performed using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures on a modified intent-to-treat population. A total of 434 patients received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment (safety population); 429 patients also had 1 or more postbaseline MADRS assessments (modified intent-to-treat population). The least squares mean differences and 95% confidence interval were statistically significant in favor of levomilnacipran ER versus placebo for the MADRS total score (-3.095 [-5.256, -0.935]; P = 0.0051) and the SDS total score (-2.632 [-4.193, -1.070]; P = 0.0010) change from baseline to week 8. Adverse events were reported in 61.8% of the placebo patients and in 81.6% of the levomilnacipran ER patients. Frequently reported adverse events (>= 5% in levomilnacipran ER and twice the rate of placebo) were nausea, dizziness, constipation, tachycardia, urinary hesitation, hyperhidrosis, insomnia, vomiting, hypertension, and ejaculation disorder. In conclusion, there was a statistically significant difference in the score change from baseline to week 8 between levomilnacipran ER and placebo on several depression rating scales, reflecting symptomatic and functional improvement; treatment was generally well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 56
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Chirality, V4, P338
[2]   Efficacy and Safety of Levomilnacipran Sustained Release 40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg in Major Depressive Disorder: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [J].
Asnis, Gregory M. ;
Bose, Anjana ;
Gommoll, Carl P. ;
Chen, Changzheng ;
Greenberg, William M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 74 (03) :242-248
[3]   Levomilnacipran (F2695), a norepinephrine-preferring SNRI: Profile in vitro and in models of depression and anxiety [J].
Auclair, A. L. ;
Martel, J. C. ;
Assie, M. B. ;
Bardin, L. ;
Heusler, P. ;
Cussac, D. ;
Marien, M. ;
Newman-Tancredi, A. ;
O'Connor, J. A. ;
Depoortere, R. .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 70 :338-347
[4]  
Bakish D, 2013, J PSYCHIAT NEUROSCI, DOI 10.11503/jpn.130040
[5]   USE OF ANALOG SCALES IN RATING SUBJECTIVE FEELINGS [J].
BOND, A ;
LADER, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 47 (SEP) :211-218
[6]   Are all antidepressants really the same? The case of fluoxetine: A systematic review [J].
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Barbui, Corrado ;
Brambilla, Paolo ;
Furukawa, Toshiaki A. ;
Hotopf, Matthew ;
Geddes, John R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 67 (06) :850-864
[7]   The development and psychometric evaluation of the Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI) [J].
Fehnel, SE ;
Bann, CM ;
Hogue, SL ;
Kwong, WJ ;
Mahajan, SS .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (07) :1321-1336
[8]   MAOI TREATMENT RESPONSE - MULTIAXIAL ASSESSMENT [J].
GILLER, E ;
BIALOS, D ;
RIDDLE, MA ;
WALDO, MC .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1988, 14 (02) :171-175
[9]  
Gommoll C, 2011, 24 ANN US PSYCH MENT
[10]   The economic burden of depression in the United States: How did it change between 1990 and 2000? [J].
Greenberg, PE ;
Kessler, RC ;
Birnbaum, HG ;
Leong, SA ;
Lowe, SW ;
Berglund, PA ;
Corey-Lisle, PK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 64 (12) :1465-1475