Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria

被引:25
作者
Bewick, Emily R. [1 ]
Dyer, Kelly A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Genet, Athens, GA 30602 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Hybridization; mate choice; selection; speciation; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; HYBRID ZONES; GENE FLOW; SPECIATION; WOLBACHIA; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1111/evo.12515
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Reinforcement of species boundaries may alter mate recognition in a way that also affects patterns of mate preference among conspecific populations. In the fly Drosophila subquinaria, females sympatric with the closely related species D. recens reject mating with heterospecific males as well as with conspecific males from allopatric populations. Here, we assess geographic variation in behavioral isolation within and among populations of D. subquinaria and use cline theory to understand patterns of selection on reinforced discrimination and its consequences for sexual isolation within species. We find that selection has fixed rejection of D. recens males in sympatry, while significant genetic variation in this behavior occurs within allopatric populations. In conspecific matings sexual isolation is also asymmetric and stronger in populations that are sympatric with D. recens. The clines in behavioral discrimination within and between species are similar in shape and are maintained by strong selection in the face of gene flow, and we show that some of their genetic basis may be either shared or linked. Thus, while reinforcement can drive extremely strong phenotypic divergence, the long-term consequences for incipient speciation depend on gene flow, genetic linkage of discrimination traits, and the cost of these behaviors in allopatry.
引用
收藏
页码:3082 / 3094
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Hybridization and speciation
    Abbott, R.
    Albach, D.
    Ansell, S.
    Arntzen, J. W.
    Baird, S. J. E.
    Bierne, N.
    Boughman, Janette W.
    Brelsford, A.
    Buerkle, C. A.
    Buggs, R.
    Butlin, R. K.
    Dieckmann, U.
    Eroukhmanoff, F.
    Grill, A.
    Cahan, S. H.
    Hermansen, J. S.
    Hewitt, G.
    Hudson, A. G.
    Jiggins, C.
    Jones, J.
    Keller, B.
    Marczewski, T.
    Mallet, J.
    Martinez-Rodriguez, P.
    Moest, M.
    Mullen, S.
    Nichols, R.
    Nolte, A. W.
    Parisod, C.
    Pfennig, K.
    Rice, A. M.
    Ritchie, M. G.
    Seifert, B.
    Smadja, C. M.
    Stelkens, R.
    Szymura, J. M.
    Vainola, R.
    Wolf, J. B. W.
    Zinner, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (02) : 229 - 246
  • [2] Andersson Malte, 1994
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1951, A MONTAGU PAPERS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1993, HYBRID ZONES EVOLUTI
  • [5] THE BARRIER TO GENETIC EXCHANGE BETWEEN HYBRIDIZING POPULATIONS
    BARTON, N
    BENGTSSON, BO
    [J]. HEREDITY, 1986, 57 : 357 - 376
  • [6] ANALYSIS OF HYBRID ZONES
    BARTON, NH
    HEWITT, GM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1985, 16 : 113 - 148
  • [7] ADAPTATION, SPECIATION AND HYBRID ZONES
    BARTON, NH
    HEWITT, GM
    [J]. NATURE, 1989, 341 (6242) : 497 - 503
  • [8] THE EVOLUTION OF STRONG REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
    Barton, Nicholas H.
    Rodriguez de Cara, Maria Angeles
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2009, 63 (05) : 1171 - 1190
  • [9] BAZYKIN AD, 1969, EVOLUTION, V23, P685, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03550.x
  • [10] The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes
    Bierne, Nicolas
    Welch, John
    Loire, Etienne
    Bonhomme, Francois
    David, Patrice
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2011, 20 (10) : 2044 - 2072