A Recent Study on the Rough Set Theory in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Problems

被引:3
|
作者
Mohamad, Masurah [1 ,2 ]
Selamat, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Krejcar, Ondrej [3 ]
Kuca, Kamil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, UTM IRDA Digital Media Ctr Excellence, Johor Baharu 81310, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Comp, Johor Baharu 81310, Malaysia
[3] Univ Hradec Kralove, Ctr Basic & Appl Res, Fac Informat & Management, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
来源
COMPUTATIONAL COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE (ICCCI 2015), PT II | 2015年 / 9330卷
关键词
Rough Set Theory; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; AHP; SELECTION; RULES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-24306-1_26
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Rough set theory (RST) is one of the data mining tools, which have many capabilities such as to minimize the size of an input data and to produce sets of decision rules from a set of data. RST is also one of the great techniques used in dealing with ambiguity and uncertainty of datasets. It was introduced by Z. Pawlak in 1997 and until now, there are many researchers who really make use of its advantages either to make an enhancement of the RST or to apply in various research areas such as in decision analysis, pattern recognition, machine learning, intelligent systems, inductive reasoning, data preprocessing, knowledge discovery, and expert systems. This paper presents a recent study on the elementary concepts of RST and its implementation in the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problems.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combining SWOT analysis and neutrosophic cognitive maps for multi-criteria decision making: a case study of organic agriculture in India
    Obbineni, Jagan
    Kandasamy, Ilanthenral
    Vasantha, W. B.
    Smarandache, Florentin
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (23) : 18311 - 18332
  • [42] An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with simplified neutrosophic sets
    Peng, Juan-juan
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Zhang, Hong-yu
    Chen, Xiao-hong
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 25 : 336 - 346
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Outdoor Heat Stress Mitigation
    Qureshi, Aiman Mazhar
    Rachid, Ahmed
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (23):
  • [44] Applying a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model to the analysis of ICT suppliers' offers
    Cid-Lopez, Andres
    Hornos, Miguel J.
    Carrasco, Ramon Alberto
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 57 : 127 - 138
  • [45] A Bayesian network for recurrent multi-criteria and multi-attribute decision problems: Choosing a manual wheelchair
    Delcroix, Veronique
    Sedki, Karima
    Lepoutre, Francois-Xavier
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (07) : 2541 - 2551
  • [46] An extension of ELECTRE to multi-criteria decision-making problems with multi-hesitant fuzzy sets
    Peng, Juan-juan
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Wang, Jing
    Yang, Li-Jun
    Chen, Xiao-hong
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 307 : 113 - 126
  • [47] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Fuzzy Decision Problems: A Case Study in the Frozen Shrimp Industry
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Nguyen, Van Thanh
    Kao, Jui-Chung
    Chen, Chih-Cheng
    Nguyen, Viet Tinh
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (03): : 1 - 18
  • [48] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY
    Navarro Martinez, I
    Marti Albinana, J., V
    Yepes Piqueras, V
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 9798 - 9807
  • [49] Innovative Computational Techniques for Multi-Criteria Decision Making, in the Context of Cultural Heritage Structures' Fire Protection: Theory
    Naziris, Iordanis A.
    Mitropoulou, Chara Ch
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    HERITAGE, 2022, 5 (03): : 1719 - 1733
  • [50] Environmental sustainability and multifaceted development: multi-criteria decision models with applications
    Colapinto, Cinzia
    Jayaraman, Raja
    Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad
    La Torre, Davide
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 293 (02) : 405 - 432