A Recent Study on the Rough Set Theory in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Problems

被引:3
|
作者
Mohamad, Masurah [1 ,2 ]
Selamat, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Krejcar, Ondrej [3 ]
Kuca, Kamil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, UTM IRDA Digital Media Ctr Excellence, Johor Baharu 81310, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Comp, Johor Baharu 81310, Malaysia
[3] Univ Hradec Kralove, Ctr Basic & Appl Res, Fac Informat & Management, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic
来源
COMPUTATIONAL COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE (ICCCI 2015), PT II | 2015年 / 9330卷
关键词
Rough Set Theory; Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; Multi-Criteria Decision Making; AHP; SELECTION; RULES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-24306-1_26
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Rough set theory (RST) is one of the data mining tools, which have many capabilities such as to minimize the size of an input data and to produce sets of decision rules from a set of data. RST is also one of the great techniques used in dealing with ambiguity and uncertainty of datasets. It was introduced by Z. Pawlak in 1997 and until now, there are many researchers who really make use of its advantages either to make an enhancement of the RST or to apply in various research areas such as in decision analysis, pattern recognition, machine learning, intelligent systems, inductive reasoning, data preprocessing, knowledge discovery, and expert systems. This paper presents a recent study on the elementary concepts of RST and its implementation in the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problems.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision analysis of steam reforming for hydrogen production
    Janosovsky, Jan
    Bohacikova, Viktoria
    Kraviarova, Dominika
    Variny, Miroslav
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 263
  • [23] A novel summarization technique for the support of resolving multi-criteria decision making problems
    Huang, Tony Cheng-Kui
    Chen, Yen-Liang
    Chang, Ting-Hao
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2015, 79 : 109 - 124
  • [24] An Approach to Multi-Criteria Decision Problems Under Severe Uncertainty
    Comes, Tina
    Hiete, Michael
    Schultmann, Frank
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2013, 20 (1-2) : 29 - 48
  • [25] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites
    Li, Jianbing
    Rahman, Mohammad Habibur
    Thring, Ronald Wallen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2010, 42 (1-3) : 220 - 239
  • [26] Hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision making based on possibility theory
    Feng, Xiangqian
    Tan, Qianyun
    Wei, Cuiping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2018, 9 (09) : 1505 - 1517
  • [27] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [28] Grey-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach: Addressing uncertainty at complex decision problems
    Maghrabie, Hesham F.
    Beauregard, Yvan
    Schiffauerova, Andrea
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 146 : 366 - 379
  • [29] A multi-criteria decision support model for evaluating the performance of partnerships
    Piltan, Mehdi
    Sowlati, Taraneh
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 45 : 373 - 384
  • [30] Prospect Theory Based Multi-criteria Decision Making Method
    Hu Jun-hua
    Zhou Yi-wen
    CCDC 2009: 21ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 2930 - 2934