Practice of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a German survey

被引:1
作者
Stamer, UM [1 ]
Messerschmidt, A [1 ]
Wulf, H [1 ]
Hoeft, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
关键词
anaesthesia; obstetric; epidural; labour pain; epidural opioids; local anaesthetics; anaesthesia provision;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Epidural analgesia is one of the preferred methods of analgesia for labour. The aim of the present survey was to evaluate current practice in obstetric analgesia in departments of anaesthesia and to make a comparison with former surveys from Germany and other countries. Questionnaires on the practice of pain relief, especially epidural analgesia, during labour and delivery were sent to 1178 anaesthesic departments in Germany in the second half of 1996. Five hundred and thirty-two completed replies were received, which represent 46.9% of all German obstetric units. The majority of the departments of anaesthesia practising epidural analgesia have an epidural rate of less than 10% and 10.2% of the departments do not offer this method to their parturients. In 86.8% of all units performing epidural analgesia, the epidural catheter is placed by an anaesthetist. Only 6.5% of the units provide a 24-h epidural service which is exclusively assigned to labour and delivery. In 77.8% of the units, this service is not exclusively assigned to obstetrics, but also to other duties. Of the obstetric units offering epidural analgesia, 14.7% have no epidural service at night. Plain local anaesthetics for epidural analgesia are used by 55.9% of the departments, a combination of local anaesthetics with epidural opioids by 28.7%. Epidural analgesia is predominantly (82.2%) maintained by intermittent bolus administration. Although the rate of epidural analgesia increased during recent decades, this method is not offered to all parturients. Further improvements in the use of epidural analgesia for labour seem to be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 314
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BENHAMOU D, 1995, CURRENT OPINION ANAE, V8, P216
[2]  
DAVIES MW, 1993, ANAESTHESIA, V48, P63
[3]  
GIBBS CP, 1986, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V65, P298
[4]   CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR VAGINAL DELIVERY IN SWEDEN - REPORT OF A NATIONWIDE INQUIRY [J].
HANSON, B ;
MATOUSKOVAHANSON, A .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 29 (07) :712-715
[5]   Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992 [J].
Hawkins, JL ;
Gibbs, CP ;
Orleans, M ;
MartinSalvaj, G ;
Beaty, B .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (01) :135-143
[6]   THE AVAILABILITY OF EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA IN OBSTETRICS [J].
HIBBARD, BM ;
SCOTT, DB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (05) :402-405
[7]   THE PRESENT POSITION OF ANESTHESIA IN OBSTETRICS IN GERMANY [J].
KNITZA, R ;
HEPP, H ;
WISSER, J ;
SANSSCHERER, U .
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1986, 46 (03) :162-169
[8]   Obstetric anesthesia coverage - The problem in perspective [J].
Lagasse, RS ;
Santos, AC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (01) :4-5
[9]  
LANZ E, 1981, ANASTH INTENSIVMED, V6, P161
[10]   OBSTETRICAL-ANESTHESIA IN ONTARIO [J].
OYSTON, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (12) :1117-1125