When it pays to have a friend on the inside: contingent effects of buyer advocacy on B2B suppliers

被引:23
作者
Lawrence, Justin M. [1 ]
Crecelius, Andrew T. [2 ]
Scheer, Lisa K. [3 ]
Lam, Son K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Spears Sch Business, 428 Business Bldg, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Ivy Coll Business, 2350 Gerdin Business Bldg, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Robert J Trulaske Sr Coll Business, 428 Cornell Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, C328 Benson Hall, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Buyer advocacy; Organizational buying; Cognitive response theory; Relationship marketing; SOURCE CREDIBILITY; INFLUENCE STRATEGIES; CUSTOMER; SALESPERSON; RESISTANCE; MODEL; SPECIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY; INVOLVEMENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11747-019-00672-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As organizational buying systems grow more complex and sophisticated, suppliers increasingly rely on buyer advocacy: an individual buyer's efforts to influence his/her colleagues such that the supplier's standing is improved. Drawing from cognitive response theory, the authors hypothesize an inverted U-shaped relationship between a buyer's advocacy for a supplier and the customer's purchases from that supplier. They theorize that this effect is moderated by the advocate's industry experience and customer-supplier relationship characteristics. An analysis of multisource data from a B2B service provider (Study 1) supports the predicted inverted U-shaped relationship, while a unique dataset from a large industrial supplier (Study 2) provides broad support for the hypothesized moderators. Finally, a randomized experiment (Study 3) replicates key findings and corroborates the theorized cognitive response mechanisms. Findings contribute to the limited literature on buyer advocacy within the organizational buying domain and offer practical implications for suppliers and buyers.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 857
页数:21
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Adamson Brent., 2015, The Challenger Customer: Selling to the Hidden Influencer Who Can Multiply Your Results
[2]   Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Yi, Youjae .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :8-34
[3]   The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs [J].
Bergkvist, Lars ;
Rossiter, John R. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2007, 44 (02) :175-184
[4]   A PROCESS-TRACING STUDY OF BRAND EXTENSION EVALUATION [J].
BOUSH, DM ;
LOKEN, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (01) :16-28
[5]  
Brock TC, 1981, COGNITIVE RESPONSES
[6]   PATTERNS OF INFORMATION SOURCE USE ACROSS INDUSTRIAL PURCHASE SITUATIONS [J].
BUNN, MD ;
CLOPTON, SW .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1993, 24 (02) :457-478
[7]  
Cameron AC., 2010, MICROECONOMETRICS US
[8]   PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING BETTER MEASURES OF MARKETING CONSTRUCTS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (01) :64-73
[9]   A self-validation perspective on the mere thought effect [J].
Clarkson, Joshua J. ;
Tormala, Zakary L. ;
Leone, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (02) :449-454
[10]  
Claycomb C., 2004, Journal of Supply Chain Management, V40, P18, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-493X.2004.TB00253.X