Projecting the future state of marine ecosystems, "la grande illusion"?

被引:51
|
作者
Planque, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Marine Res, N-9294 Tromso, Norway
[2] Hjort Ctr Marine Ecosyst Dynam, N-9294 Tromso, Norway
关键词
climate change; marine ecosystems; numerical models; predictability; BARENTS SEA; OCEAN; RECONSTRUCTION; MECHANISMS; CHALLENGES; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS; PHYSICS; MODELS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fsv155
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Using numerical models to project the state of marine ecosystems several decades into the future is commonly advocated, in particular for investigating the possible effects of climate change. Numerical models are useful to explore how ocean climate and other drivers may regulate the dynamics of marine ecosystems and constitute indispensable tools to test our conceptual representations of how marine systems function. However, I argue here that these models might be of limited use to project the future state of marine ecosystems decades into the future because several factors limit predictability. These include stochasticity, deterministic chaos, enablement vs. entailment, non-ergodicity, ecological surprises, irreducibility, and limits to upscaling. Many simulations of ecosystem states in the distant future may be no more than a "grande illusion" until explicit evaluations of how uncertainties increase with the time horizon of projection are performed.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 208
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Uncertainties in projecting climate-change impacts in marine ecosystems
    Payne, Mark R.
    Barange, Manuel
    Cheung, WilliamW. L.
    MacKenzie, Brian R.
    Batchelder, Harold P.
    Cormon, Xochitl
    Eddy, Tyler D.
    Fernandes, Jose A.
    Hollowed, Anne B.
    Jones, Miranda C.
    Link, Jason S.
    Neubauer, Philipp
    Ortiz, Ivonne
    Queiros, Ana M.
    Paula, Jose Ricardo
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2016, 73 (05) : 1272 - 1282
  • [2] Pechora Sea ecosystems: current state and future challenges
    Sukhotin, Alexey
    Denisenko, Stanislav
    Galaktionov, Kirill
    POLAR BIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (09) : 1631 - 1645
  • [3] Modeling the state of marine ecosystems: A case study of the Okhotsk Sea
    Varotsos, Costas A.
    Krapivin, Vladimir F.
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2019, 194 : 1 - 10
  • [4] Polar marine ecosystems: major threats and future change
    Clarke, A
    Harris, CM
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 30 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [5] Advancing Global Ecological Modeling Capabilities to Simulate Future Trajectories of Change in Marine Ecosystems
    Coll, Marta
    Steenbeek, Jeroen
    Pennino, Maria Grazia
    Buszowski, Joe
    Kaschner, Kristin
    Lotze, Heike K.
    Rousseau, Yannick
    Tittensor, Derek P.
    Walters, Carl
    Watson, Reg A.
    Christensen, Villy
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [6] Consistent global responses of marine ecosystems to future climate change across the IPCC AR5 earth system models
    Cabre, Anna
    Marinov, Irina
    Leung, Shirley
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2015, 45 (5-6) : 1253 - 1280
  • [7] Current state and trends in Canadian Arctic marine ecosystems: I. Primary production
    Tremblay, Jean-Eric
    Robert, Dominique
    Varela, Diana E.
    Lovejoy, Connie
    Darnis, Gerald
    Nelson, R. John
    Sastri, Akash R.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 115 (01) : 161 - 178
  • [8] Pechora Sea ecosystems: current state and future challenges
    Alexey Sukhotin
    Stanislav Denisenko
    Kirill Galaktionov
    Polar Biology, 2019, 42 : 1631 - 1645
  • [9] Future sea surface temperatures in Large Marine Ecosystems of the Northwest Atlantic
    Khan, Amina H.
    Levac, Elisabeth
    Chmura, Gail L.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (05) : 915 - 921
  • [10] Projecting the future ecological state of lakes in Denmark in a 6 degree warming scenario
    Trolle, Dennis
    Nielsen, Anders
    Rolighed, Jonas
    Thodsen, Hans
    Andersen, Hans E.
    Karlsson, Ida B.
    Refsgaard, Jens C.
    Olesen, Jorgen E.
    Bolding, Karsten
    Kronvang, Brian
    Sondergaard, Martin
    Jeppesen, Erik
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (01) : 55 - 72