Seismic Performance of Three-Story Cross-Laminated Timber Structures in Japan

被引:15
作者
Zhang, Xiaolan [1 ]
Ishoda, Hiroshi [1 ]
Sumida, Kotaro [1 ]
Araki, Yasuhiro [2 ]
Nakashima, Shoichi [3 ]
Nakagawa, Takafumi [1 ]
Akiyama, Nobuhiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Res Inst Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Land & Infrastruct Management, Dept Architectural Res, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050804, Japan
[3] Bldg Res Inst, Grp Struct Res, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3003263, Japan
关键词
Cross-laminated timber; Seismic performance; Balloon-framing; Platform-framing; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002897
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To promote the development of cross-laminated timber (CLT) structures, the Japanese Government Notifications on Structural Design of CLT Buildings (GN 611) was issued in 2016. In GN 611, three types of platform-framing CLT structures were classified in the simple calculation method of Route-1. Compared with a platform-framing structure, which has been clarified in GN 611, a balloon-framing structure is superior in shortening the construction period and reducing the number of CLT panels and metal connectors. To study the seismic properties of balloon-framing CLT structures and develop new structures for a CLT building, four full-scale, 3-story CLT structures were tested under quasistatic cyclic loading: Specimen 1 was a platform-framing structure with narrow wall panels; Specimen 2 was a balloon-framing structure with continuous wall panels; Specimen 3 a was platform-framing structure with wide wall panels; and Specimen 4 was a balloon-framing structure with continuous wall panels and glulam beams. In this study, experiments were conducted, and the seismic performance of the balloon- and platform-framing CLT structures were evaluated and compared. The test results indicated that the seismic properties of Specimens 1, 2, and 3 were similar and that the design method of Specimen 1, as specified in GN 611, was applicable for Specimens 2 and 3. Specimen 4 exhibited higher lateral load resistance than the other three specimens. The performance of Specimen 4 depended on the moment-resisting performance of the glulam beam and CLTwall joint. In this case, the moment-resisting performance obtained through the experiment was significantly higher than the predicted performance. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Systematic experimental investigation to support the development of seismic performance factors for cross laminated timber shear wall systems [J].
Amini, M. Omar ;
van de Lindt, John W. ;
Rammer, Douglas ;
Pei, Shiling ;
Line, Philip ;
Popovski, Marjan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 172 :392-404
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, TECHNICAL DATA SHEET
[3]   Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development [J].
Brandner, R. ;
Flatscher, G. ;
Ringhofer, A. ;
Schickhofer, G. ;
Thiel, A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WOOD AND WOOD PRODUCTS, 2016, 74 (03) :331-351
[4]  
Brandner R., 2014, Focus Solid Timber Solutions - European Conference on Cross Laminated Timber (CLT), P3
[5]   SOFIE project-3D shaking table test on a seven-storey full-scale cross-laminated timber building [J].
Ceccotti, Ario ;
Sandhaas, Carmen ;
Okabe, Minoru ;
Yasumura, Motoi ;
Minowa, Chikahiro ;
Kawai, Naohito .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (13) :2003-2021
[6]  
Committee of CLT Manual, 2016, DES CONSTR MAN CLT B
[7]   Seismic behaviour of Cross-Laminated Timber structures: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Izzi, Matteo ;
Casagrande, Daniele ;
Bezzi, Stefano ;
Pasca, Dag ;
Follesa, Maurizio ;
Tomasi, Roberto .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 170 :42-52
[8]  
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishery), 2013, JAP AGR NOT 336 NO 3
[9]  
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishery), 2018, JAP AGR STAND NOT 33
[10]  
Miyake T., 2016, P WOOD C TIMB ENG WC, P3493