Dry matter and nitrogen accumulations and partitioning in two potato cultivars

被引:33
|
作者
Alva, AK [1 ]
Hodges, T [1 ]
Boydston, RA [1 ]
Collins, HP [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, PWA, Vegetable & Forage Crops Res Unit, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1081/PLN-120006047
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Potato plant dry matter and nutrient accumulation and partitioning patterns into various parts of the plant are important to fine tune management practices that optimize the nutrient uptake efficiency and tuber production. Accumulation and partitioning of dry matter and nitrogen (N) during the growing period were evaluated in this four year study for two potato cultivars in high yielding production conditions in the Columbia Basin production region in Washington, under irrigated farming. Studies were conducted on a Quincy fine sand, which represents a typical potato production soil in this region. A full season indeterminate potato cultivar (Russet Burbank) and an early maturing determinate cultivar (Hilite Russet) were used in this study. Partitioning of assimilates into the tuber was similar for both cultivars. The tuber weight accounted for 76 to 87% of total plant weight, while that of stem and leaf weight accounted for 3 to 11, and 9 to 13%, respectively. Tuber weight increased rapidly during 60 to 100 days after planting. Nitrogen content in the tuber, in relation to the total N in the plant, accounted for 81 to 86, and 83 to 89%, for the Hilite Russet and Russet Burbank cultivars, respectively. Nitrogen in the leaves comprised 6 to 18%, and in the stem 3 to 5% of the total plant N. Prior to senescence of the vines, total N in the plants (excluding roots) accounted for up to 350 kg ha(-1). At this growth stage, the N in tubers, leaves, and stems represented 68.6, 19.4, and 12.0%, respectively. The above information is useful for N management with the knowledge of soil residual N and availability of N from mineralization of crop residue during the crop growing season.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1630
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NITROGEN PARTITIONING AND DRY-MATTER DISTRIBUTION IN 3 COWPEA CULTIVARS
    DASILVEIRA, JAG
    CASTRO, PRC
    DECHEN, AR
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1989, 24 (09) : 1153 - 1160
  • [2] Carbohydrates and dry matter in tubers of potato cultivars as affected by nitrogen doses
    Braun, Heder
    Rezende Fontes, Paulo Cezar
    Finger, Fernando Luiz
    Busato, Camilo
    Cecon, Paulo Roberto
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2010, 34 (02): : 285 - 293
  • [3] DRY-MATTER PRODUCTION AND NITROGEN-UTILIZATION BY 6 POTATO CULTIVARS
    KLEINKOPF, GE
    WESTERMANN, DT
    DWELLE, RB
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1981, 73 (05) : 799 - 803
  • [4] Evaluation of growth performance and dry matter partitioning of four processing potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars
    Geremew, E. B.
    Steyn, J. M.
    Annandale, J. G.
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (03) : 385 - 393
  • [5] Effect of Photoperiod on Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning in Potato
    Wen, Liwei
    Meng, Meilian
    Liu, Kunyu
    Zhang, Qionglin
    Zhang, Tingting
    Chen, Youjun
    Liang, Hongwei
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [6] PARTITIONING OF DRY-MATTER IN POTATO AS AFFECTED BY CULTIVAR
    BATUTIS, EJ
    EWING, EE
    BENKHEDHER, M
    AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1983, 60 (10): : 802 - 802
  • [7] EFFECTS OF NITROGEN ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF THE POTATO PLANT .2. THE PARTITIONING OF DRY-MATTER, NITROGEN AND NITRATE
    BIEMOND, H
    VOS, J
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1992, 70 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [8] Dry matter production and partitioning in potato plants subjected to combined deficiencies of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium
    Jenkins, PD
    Mahmood, S
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2003, 143 (02) : 215 - 229
  • [9] Nitrogen rate effect on partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by cotton
    Boquet, DJ
    Breitenbeck, GA
    CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (06) : 1685 - 1693
  • [10] Lateral Spread and Dry Matter Partitioning of Creeping Bentgrass Cultivars
    Jones, Marcus A.
    Christians, Nick E.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (01) : 393 - 399