Assessment and optimization of provincial CO2 emission reduction scheme in China: An improved ZSG-DEA approach

被引:89
作者
Yang, Mian [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Yaru [1 ]
Ji, Qiang [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Dayong [5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Econ Dev Res, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
CO(2 )emissions; DEA; Efficiency; Fairness; ZSG-DEA; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; INDUSTRIAL SECTORS; ENERGY INTENSITY; ALLOCATION; EFFICIENCY; GAINS; DECOMPOSITION; REALLOCATION; EQUITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104931
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper applies the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis (ZSG-DEA) model to assess the provincial CO2 emission reduction scheme of China in 2020 and then calculates optimized values for the provinces in 2030. Results from two standard optimization procedures to solve the ZSG-DEA model are compared. We also extend the current methods by improving the iterative approach and then introduce fairness to the efficiency-oriented approach for the 2030 case. We found that the choice of optimization procedures has only a minimal impact on the results, but the specification of model does matter. For 2020, a standard DEA approach shows that only 2 provinces out of 30 are efficient. According to the estimation results of the ZSG-DEA model, 12 provinces need to set higher reduction targets, whereas the other 18 provinces could have lower target values to achieve overall efficiency. These results are generally consistent across different optimization approaches. The improved approach is applied to further evaluate a number of scenarios in 2030. in which the adjustment values towards optimum can be calculated for each scenario. Furthermore, we show that the inclusion of fairness can significantly affect the adjustment targets, which is of great importance to policymakers (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis [J].
Beasley, JE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) :198-216
[2]   A more scientific allocation scheme of carbon dioxide emissions allowances: The case from China [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Ye, Peiyun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 215 :903-912
[3]  
CERS, 2018, CHIN EN OUTL 2030
[4]   How can China allocate CO2 reduction targets at the provincial level considering both equity and efficiency? Evidence from its Copenhagen Accord pledge [J].
Dong, Feng ;
Long, Ruyin ;
Yu, Bolin ;
Wang, Ying ;
Li, Jingyun ;
Wang, Yue ;
Dai, Yuanju ;
Yang, Qingliang ;
Chen, Hong .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 130 :31-43
[5]   Optimization analysis of carbon emission rights allocation based on energy justice-The case of China [J].
Fang, Guochang ;
Liu, Menghe ;
Tian, Lixin ;
Fu, Min ;
Zhang, Yue .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 :748-758
[6]   How can China achieve its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions by 2030? A multi-criteria allocation of China's carbon emission allowance [J].
Fang, Kai ;
Zhang, Qifeng ;
Long, Yin ;
Yoshida, Yoshikuni ;
Sun, Lu ;
Zhang, Haoran ;
Dou, Yi ;
Li, Shuai .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 241 :380-389
[7]   Technology gap and CO2 emission reduction potential by technical efficiency measures: A meta-frontier modeling for the Chinese agricultural sector [J].
Fei, Rilong ;
Lin, Boqiang .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 73 :653-661
[8]   Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models [J].
Gomes, E. G. ;
Lins, M. P. E. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (05) :616-623
[9]   Efficiency evaluation of regional energy saving and emission reduction in China: A modified slacks-based measure approach [J].
Guo, Xuefeng ;
Zhu, Qingyuan ;
Lv, Lin ;
Chu, Junfei ;
Wu, Jie .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :1313-1321
[10]  
IPCC, 2018, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157940