Structural modelling of collective action behavior of farmers for natural resource management

被引:1
作者
Priyadarshni, Priti [1 ]
Padaria, R. N. [1 ]
Burman, R. R. [1 ]
Singh, Rashmi [1 ]
Bandyopadhyay, Sanjoy [1 ]
Kumar, Pramod [1 ,2 ]
Bhowmik, Arpan [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Romen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Stat Res Inst, New Delhi, India
[3] ICAR Res Complex NEH Reg, Dimapur, Nagaland, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2022年 / 92卷 / 01期
关键词
Collective action; Natural resource management; Structural equation modelling;
D O I
10.56093/ijas.v92i1.120847
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Community engagement is a crucial element for effective management of natural resources. This study is aimed at determining the factors and analyzing their path for collective action behavior of farmers towards natural resource management. Two cases of community based natural resource management were conducted in Phek and Kohima districts of Nagaland during 2020 and with thematic their analysis of activities, the probable factors of collective action among the communities were listed. Through participatory rural appraisal, focus group discussion and personal interview method data, was collected with a total sample size of randomly selected 106 farmers. The composite reliability for the explanatory variables, viz. social cohesiveness, nonnative belief, collective action for resource management, trust, community orientation, social relationship, and shared values were 0.79, 0.81,0.92, 0.6, 0.72, 0.78, and 0.52, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in 7 factors with 63.7% of the total variance explained. The obtained factors were validated through measurement modelling by confirmatory factor analysis. The structural model had goodness of fit with acceptable values of RMSEA (0.09), GFI (0.96) and CFI (0.92). The relationship of community orientation was found highly significant with nonnative belief (Z=6.36**); social cohesiveness (2.27**) and collective action (Z=3.47**). Emphasis should be laid upon promotion of normative beliefs, local institutions, and social values for augmentation of collective action for natural resource management.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 100
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion [J].
Ab Hamid, M. R. ;
Sami, W. ;
Sidek, M. H. Mohmad .
1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED & INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS 2017 (ICOAIMS 2017), 2017, 890
[2]  
Aila-Leena Matthies., 2011, Nordic Social Work Research, V1, P125
[3]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[4]   Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management [J].
Armitage, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 35 (06) :703-715
[5]  
Bandura A., 1971, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, V79
[6]   Social learning: an alternative policy instrument for managing in the context of Europe's water [J].
Blackmore, Chris ;
Ison, Ray ;
Jiggins, Janice .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (06) :493-498
[7]   EVALUATING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
FORNELL, C ;
LARCKER, DF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :39-50
[8]   TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A casual model [J].
Forza, C ;
Filippini, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1998, 55 (01) :1-20
[9]  
Hair J.F., 2016, A First on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57413-415, 10.15358/9783800653614]
[10]  
Hauberer J., 2010, Social Capital Theory Towards a Methodological Foundation