A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection

被引:544
作者
Lima Junior, Francisco Rodrigues [1 ]
Osiro, Lauro [2 ]
Ribeiro Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prod Engn, Sch Engn Sao Carlos, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Triangulo Mineiro UFTM, Dept Prod Engn, Uberaba, MG, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Supplier selection; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy AHP; Multicriteria decision making; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Supplier selection has become a very critical activity to the performance of organizations and supply chains. Studies presented in the literature propose the use of the methods Fuzzy TOPSIS (Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and Fuzzy AHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) to aid the supplier selection decision process. However, there are no comparative studies of these two methods when applied to the problem of supplier selection. Thus, this paper presents a comparative analysis of these two methods in the context of supplier selection decision making. The comparison was made based on the factors: adequacy to changes of alternatives or criteria; agility in the decision process; computational complexity; adequacy to support group decision making; the number of alternative suppliers and criteria; and modeling of uncertainty. As an illustrative example, both methods were applied to the selection of suppliers of a company in the automotive production chain. In addition, computational tests were performed considering several scenarios of supplier selection. The results have shown that both methods are suitable for the problem of supplier selection, particularly to supporting group decision making and modeling of uncertainty. However, the comparative analysis has shown that the Fuzzy TOPSIS method is better suited to the problem of supplier selection in regard to changes of alternatives and criteria, agility and number of criteria and alternative suppliers. Thus, this comparative study contributes to helping researchers and practitioners to choose more effective approaches for supplier selection. Suggestions of further work are also proposed so as to make these methods more adequate to the problem of supplier selection. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 209
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [31] An integrated fuzzy-lp approach for a supplier selection problem in supply chain management
    Guneri, Ali Fuat
    Yucel, Atakan
    Ayyildiz, Gokhan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (05) : 9223 - 9228
  • [32] Suppliers' affective trust and trust in competency in buyers Its effect on collaboration and logistics efficiency
    Ha, Byoung-Chun
    Park, Yang-Kyu
    Cho, Sungbin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (1-2) : 56 - 77
  • [33] Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review
    Ho, William
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 202 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [34] Supplier selection using fuzzy quality data and their applications to touch screen
    Hsu, Bi-Min
    Chiang, Ching-Yi
    Shu, Ming-Hung
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (09) : 6192 - 6200
  • [35] Hudymácová M, 2010, ACTA MONTAN SLOVACA, V15, P249
  • [36] Integrating fuzzy TOPSIS and multi-period goal programming for purchasing multiple products from multiple suppliers
    Jolai, Fariborz
    Yazdian, Seyed Ahmad
    Shahanaghi, Kamran
    Khojasteh, Mohammad Azari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (01) : 42 - 53
  • [37] Kahraman C., 2003, Logistics Information Management, V16, P382, DOI 10.1108/09576050310503367
  • [38] Kannan V.R., 2002, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V38, P11, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-493X.2002.TB00139.X
  • [39] Supply source selection criteria: The impact of supplier performance on distributor performance
    Katsikeas, CS
    Paparoidamis, NG
    Katsikea, E
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2004, 33 (08) : 755 - 764
  • [40] The Fuzzy ART algorithm: A categorization method for supplier evaluation and selection
    Keskin, Guelsen Aydin
    Ilhan, Sevinc
    Ozkan, Coskun
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (02) : 1235 - 1240