The role of target membrane sialic acid residues in the fusion activity of the influenza virus: The effect of two types of ganglioside on the kinetics of membrane merging

被引:0
作者
Ramalho-Santos, J [1 ]
De Lima, MCP
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Dept Biochem, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Dept Zool, P-3004517 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
influenza virus; membrane fusion; sialic acid; gangliosides; liposomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The influenza virus enters target cells via the action of hemagglutinin proteins (HA) inserted into the viral envelope. HA promotes membrane fusion between the viral envelope and endosomal membrane at low pH, following viral binding to sialic acid-containing receptors on target cells, and internalization by endocytosis. The effect of target membrane sialic acid residues on the fusion activity of the influenza virus towards model membranes was evaluated by both reduction, (i.e. treating somatic cells with neuraminidase- (NA-) prior to virus-cell interactions), and by supplementing liposomes with the gangliosides GD1a and GT1b. The harshness of the neuraminidase pretreatment of target cells required to affect virus-induced membrane merging was found to greatly depend on the assay conditions, i.e. whether a virus-cell prebinding step at neutral pH was included prior to acidification. Minor concentrations of neuraminidase were found to greatly reduce virus fusion, but only in the absence of a prebinding step; they had no effect if this step was included. Although membrane merging was greatly reduced following cell neuraminidase pretreatment, virus-cell association at low pH was not disturbed proportionately. This probably reflects unspecific virus-cell binding under these conditions, probably of inactivated or aggregated virus particles, which does not translate into membrane merging. This seems to suggest both that target membrane sialic acid can protect the virus from losing its activity before triggering membrane merging, and that the importance of this interaction is not merely to ensure virus-target proximity. With liposomes, we found that both types of ganglioside supported efficient fusion, with GD1a promoting a slightly faster initial rate. However, in this case, virus-target proximity closely mirrored fusion activity, thus pointing to differential specificity between targets routinely used to assay influenza virus fusion activity.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Entry of influenza virus into a glycosphingolipid-deficient mouse skin fibroblast cell line
    Ablan, S
    Rawat, SS
    Blumenthal, R
    Puri, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2001, 146 (11) : 2227 - 2238
  • [2] FUSION OF INFLUENZA-VIRUS WITH SIALIC ACID-BEARING TARGET MEMBRANES
    ALFORD, D
    ELLENS, H
    BENTZ, J
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 33 (08) : 1977 - 1987
  • [3] BERGELSON LD, 1982, EUR J BIOCHEM, V128, P467
  • [4] Mechanisms of viral membrane fusion and its inhibition
    Eckert, DM
    Kim, PS
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 70 : 777 - 810
  • [5] FLUORESCENCE METHOD FOR MEASURING THE KINETICS OF FUSION BETWEEN BIOLOGICAL-MEMBRANES
    HOEKSTRA, D
    DEBOER, T
    KLAPPE, K
    WILSCHUT, J
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 1984, 23 (24) : 5675 - 5681
  • [6] Membrane fusion: Structure snared at last
    Hughson, FM
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (02) : R49 - R52
  • [7] Reversible stages of the low-pH-triggered conformational change in influenza virus hemagglutinin
    Leikina, E
    Ramos, C
    Markovic, I
    Zimmerberg, J
    Chernomordik, LV
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2002, 21 (21) : 5701 - 5710
  • [8] Delay of influenza hemagglutinin refolding into a fusion-competent conformation by receptor binding: A hypothesis
    Leikina, E
    Markovic, I
    Chernomordik, LV
    Kozlov, MM
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 79 (03) : 1415 - 1427
  • [9] LIMA MCP, 1995, BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA, V1236, P323
  • [10] Membrane fusion by surrogate receptor-bound influenza haemagglutinin
    Millar, BMG
    Calder, LJ
    Skehel, JJ
    Wiley, DC
    [J]. VIROLOGY, 1999, 257 (02) : 415 - 423