Maternal occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and the risk of brain cancer in the offspring

被引:34
作者
Li, Peizhi [1 ]
McLaughlin, John [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Infante-Rivard, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[2] Canc Care Ontario, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Della Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
[4] Mt Sinai Hosp, Samuel Lunenfeld Res Inst, Toronto, ON M5T 3L9, Canada
关键词
Brain neoplasms; Childhood neoplasms; Occupational exposure; Maternal exposure; Electromagnetic fields; PARENTAL OCCUPATION; CHILDHOOD-CANCER; ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS; TUMORS; LEUKEMIA; METAANALYSIS; SOLVENTS; UTILITY; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-009-9311-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To examine the contribution of maternal occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) shortly before and during pregnancy on the incidence of childhood brain tumors. A total of 548 incident cases and 760 healthy controls recruited between 1980 and 2002 from two Canadian provinces (Qu,bec and Ontario) were included in this study, and their mothers were interviewed. Quantitative occupational ELF-MF exposure in microTesla units was estimated using individual exposure estimations or a job exposure matrix. We used three metrics to analyze exposure: cumulative, average, and maximum level attained. Using the average exposure metric measured before conception, an increased risk was observed for astroglial tumors (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0-2.4). During the entire pregnancy period, a significantly increased risk was observed for astroglial tumors as well as for all childhood brain tumors with the average metric (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.5 and OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-2.2, respectively). Based on job titles, a twofold risk increase was observed for astroglial tumors (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.8-6.3) and for all childhood brain tumors (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.0-5.4) among sewing machine operators. Results are suggestive of a possible association between maternal occupational ELF-MF exposure and certain brain tumors in their offspring.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 955
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Current thinking about risks from currents [J].
Ahlbom, A ;
Feychting, M .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9263) :1143-1144
[2]   A case-control study of parental occupation, leukemia, and brain tumors in an industrial city in Taiwan [J].
Ali, R ;
Yu, CL ;
Wu, MT ;
Ho, CK ;
Pan, BJ ;
Smith, T ;
Christiani, DC .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 46 (09) :985-992
[3]   Parental occupation, occupational exposure to solvents and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of childhood brain tumors (Italy, France, Spain) [J].
Cordier, S ;
Lefeuvre, B ;
Filippini, G ;
PerisBonet, R ;
Farinotti, M ;
Lovicu, G ;
Mandereau, L .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1997, 8 (05) :688-697
[4]   Parental occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields and radiation and the incidence of neuroblastoma in offspring [J].
De Roos, AJ ;
Teschke, K ;
Savitz, DA ;
Poole, C ;
Grufferman, S ;
Pollock, BH ;
Olshan, AF .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (05) :508-517
[5]   Individual estimation of exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields in jobs commonly held by women [J].
Deadman, JE ;
Infante-Rivard, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 155 (04) :368-378
[6]  
*DEP MANP IMM, 1974, CAN CLASS DICT OCC, V1
[7]   USE OF A JOB-EXPOSURE MATRIX TO EVALUATE PARENTAL OCCUPATION AND CHILDHOOD-CANCER [J].
FEINGOLD, L ;
SAVITZ, DA ;
JOHN, EM .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1992, 3 (02) :161-169
[8]   Occupational and residential magnetic field exposure and leukemia and central nervous system tumors [J].
Feychting, M ;
Forssen, U ;
Floderus, B .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (04) :384-389
[9]   Parental occupational exposure to magnetic fields and childhood cancer (Sweden) [J].
Feychting, M ;
Floderus, B ;
Ahlbom, A .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2000, 11 (02) :151-156
[10]   Maternal exposure to occupational solvents and childhood leukemia [J].
Infante-Rivard, C ;
Siemiatycki, J ;
Lakhani, R ;
Nadon, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (06) :787-792