Feature evaluation for land use and land cover classification based on statistical, textural, and shape features over Landsat and Sentinel imagery

被引:2
作者
Coronado, Abel [1 ,2 ]
Moctezuma, Daniela [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Estadist & Geog, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
[2] Ctr Invest & Innovac Tecnol Informac & Comunicac, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
[3] Consejo Nacl Ciencia & Technol, Direcc Catedras, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[4] Ctr Invest Ciencias Informac Geoespacial, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
关键词
land use and land cover; multispectral images; machine learning; feature extraction; ORIENTED FEATURE-SELECTION; EARTH OBSERVATION; INDEX; PERFORMANCE; FOREST; AREAS; AUSTRALIA; DATASET;
D O I
10.1117/1.JRS.14.048503
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of remote sensing data has become very useful to generate statistical information about society and its environment. In this sense, land use and land cover classification (LULC) are tasks related to determining the cover on the Earth's surface. In the decision-making process, this kind of information is relevant to handle in the best way how the information about events such as earthquakes or cadastre information can be used. To attend this, a methodology to perform supervised classification based on the combination of statistical, textural, and shape features for the LULC classification problem is proposed. For the experiments, thousands of Landsat and Sentinel images covering all of Mexico and Europe, respectively, were used. Twelve LULC classes were established for Mexico territory, and 10 were established for Europe. This methodology was applied to both datasets and benchmarking with multiple well-known classifiers (random forest, support vector machines, extra trees, and artificial neural network). As a result, the overall accuracy (OA) for Landsat and Sentinel-2 was reached 77.1% and 96.7%, respectively. The performance of the different types of features was compared using Mexico and Europe images. Interesting results were achieved and some conclusions about using traditional and non-traditional features were found in the LULC classification task. (C) 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Adam F., 2018, PROCEEDINGS, V2, P349
[2]   Earth observation in service of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [J].
Anderson, Katherine ;
Ryan, Barbara ;
Sonntag, William ;
Kavvada, Argyro ;
Friedl, Lawrence .
Geo-Spatial Information Science, 2017, 20 (02) :77-96
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES, DOI DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-3-S1-S18
[4]   Who launched what, when and why; trends in global land-cover observation capacity from civilian earth observation satellites [J].
Belward, Alan S. ;
Skoien, Jon O. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 103 :115-128
[5]   A New Spectral Index for Extraction of Built-Up Area Using Landsat-8 Data [J].
Bouzekri, Sara ;
Lasbet, Abdel Aziz ;
Lachehab, Ammar .
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 43 (04) :867-873
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   A high-performance and in-season classification system of field-level crop types using time-series Landsat data and a machine learning approach [J].
Cai, Yaping ;
Guan, Kaiyu ;
Peng, Jian ;
Wang, Shaowen ;
Seifert, Christopher ;
Wardlow, Brian ;
Li, Zhan .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 210 :35-47
[8]   Remote Sensing Feature Selection by Kernel Dependence Measures [J].
Camps-Valls, Gustavo ;
Mooij, Joris ;
Schoelkopf, Bernhard .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2010, 7 (03) :587-591
[9]  
Cavallaro G, 2019, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P875, DOI [10.1109/igarss.2019.8899831, 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8899831]
[10]  
Chen JL, 2010, 2010 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATICS